Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 10, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated staff will calculate the exact maximum increase allowed by 2 <br />the Charter and present it at second reading. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Council Member Hull asked why a yearly sunset provision was placed. Clerk-Administrator 5 <br />Ericson stated the original approval in 1992 was for 5 years and when it was re-approved, an 6 <br />annual adoption was added so the Council can review it each year. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Stigney stated the annual sunset provision started so each Council could 9 <br />determine whether it was or was not needed. This fee was started to off set money going directly 10 <br />out of tax payer’s pockets for tax exempt properties and, unfortunately, became relied on as 11 <br />another revenue source. He stated support to charge the maximum allowed by the Charter. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Hull asked if business owners and the Chamber of Commerce disagreed with 14 <br />the franchise fee in 1992. Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated some business owners, but not an 15 <br />overwhelming number, did speak in 1992 against the franchise fee. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Finance Director Beer explained the City views franchise fees as just one piece of the entire 18 <br />“package” that includes water and sewer rates, overall tax levy, and cost of business licensing. 19 <br />He advised that when looking at that “package,” it is reasonable to do business in Mounds View. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Council Member Hull noted this is a regressive tax at a straight percentage so it may impact 22 <br />smaller businesses more than larger sized businesses. He asked what service taxpayers receive 23 <br />for this fee. Finance Director Beer stated it off sets the costs for fire and police protection, the 24 <br />park system, and maintaining a business code. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Flaherty stated he voted to reduce the fee to 3.75% after business owners raised the issue 27 <br />that the fee was to have a sunset date. He noted when the City of Minneapolis imposed a liquor 28 <br />tax to build the Metro Dome, it was to have a sunset date but has never come off the books. 29 <br />Mayor Flaherty pointed out that Mounds View residents pay a franchise fee on water and sewer 30 <br />billing. Finance Director Beer estimated that slightly more in franchise fees is paid by the 31 <br />business community than by residents. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Finance Director Beer noted the Street Plan relies on funding from the franchise fee so once the 34 <br />Street Plan has been completed, it would be the appropriate time to phase out the franchise fee. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Stigney stated the biggest user of electricity is Medtronic and they also receive 37 <br />the biggest tax break but because of the City’s small-sized business community, residents pay a 38 <br />larger portion. He noted the amount paid by the taxpayers is a direct offset to levied taxes for 39 <br />City services they receive. Council Member Stigney pointed out that taxpayers receive a better 40 <br />break if the fee is increased to where it should be and if the fee is not needed, then the levy 41 <br />should be reduced. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Council Member Mueller stated a regressive fee can be described as something that effects 44 <br />everyone in the community equally, including nonprofits, and since all use electricity and pay a 45