My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2009/10/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Agenda Packets - 2009/10/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:31 PM
Creation date
7/4/2018 11:30:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/12/2009
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 14, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 2 <br />A. Resolution 7494, Authorizing Certification of the Proposed General Fund 3 <br />Budget and Property Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2010. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Finance Director Beer reviewed the impact of unallotted LGA and the State levy cap. In 6 <br />addition, the City’s Charter cap formula allows for a 1% levy increase. Finance Director Beer 7 <br />presented the totals for the general fund levy and special levies, resulting in an increase of 8 <br />$337,994 or 8.9% over 2009. He explained that State law requires the City to certify a proposed 9 <br />2010 General Fund Budget and proposed 2010 property tax levy to Ramsey County by 10 <br />September 15, 2009. Once set by the City Council, it can be lowered but not increased. Finance 11 <br />Director Beer reviewed a sample impact of estimated taxes for a median home value in Mounds 12 <br />View, noting an increase of $124. 13 <br /> 14 <br />William Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, suggested the tax reduction fund be used to reduce taxes. 15 <br />Finance Director Beer stated that fund contains $6.5 million and the Council has directed to 16 <br />transfer and use $250,000 from the tax reduction fund. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Naja Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, suggested expenses be cut, possibly including reduced staff 19 <br />or frozen salaries. She felt there would be a long-term impact and expressed concern about the 20 <br />City’s high number of home foreclosures. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Finance Director Beer presented three scenarios for use of the tax levy reduction fund, noting the 23 <br />dates by which the fund would be depleted depending on the extent of the levy increase 24 <br />approved. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mr. Werner asked what the increase would be today without the levy reduction fund. Finance 27 <br />Director Beer stated $250,000 would have to be added to the live. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, referenced the 2010 budget summary and asked if the 30 <br />total revenue increase was $470,000 in 2009. Finance Director Beer stated the grand total of 31 <br />LGA was $642,000. Mr. Amundsen stated that in 2008 the actual was $5.6 million spent and in 32 <br />2009 it goes to $6.1 million, or an increase of about 10%. Finance Director Beer noted that in 33 <br />2008, LGA of $148,000 was unalloted by the State. Clerk-Administrator Ericson advised that a 34 <br />10% increase was not anticipated because of the unallotment by the State. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mr. Amundsen stated he felt it was appropriate that the 2010 projected budget was back to the 37 <br />2008 level. He stated that in 2008, he had suggested the LGA money be put aside as “rainy day 38 <br />money” and not be used. However, the City used the funds and now the State has unalloted those 39 <br />funds. Mr. Amundsen noted that all are seeing decreases in family income and salaries yet the 40 <br />government is having more needs and wanting more tax dollars. He suggested that the economic 41 <br />dilemma would continue, possibly for several years. He felt it was appropriate now to use the 42 <br />levy reduction fund, possibly heavily for the next two to three years. He urged the Council to 43 <br />keep expenses in check with the assumption there will be no additional revenues for several 44 <br />years. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.