Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 26, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />is not letting Mr. Moritko “off the hook” in any way. He stated this business is in trouble and 1 <br />when that occurs, the Council welcomes them to address the issues to see if solutions can be 2 <br />found. Mayor Flaherty stated he appreciates the comments of Mr. Halverson, who is an astute 3 <br />businessman, who had previously indicated to him that Moe’s complements their business. With 4 <br />regard to the number of times the Council will consider an extension, Mayor Flaherty stated the 5 <br />Council will consider it as long as there is a plan in place and a time limit. He asked what would 6 <br />happen if the delinquent taxes are not up-to-date by May 1, 2010, and the Council revokes the 7 <br />liquor license. Mr. Moritko stated he is not asking for the Council to look past May 1 and he is 8 <br />100% confident it will not be an issue. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Mayor Flaherty requested a legal opinion. City Attorney Riggs stated this consideration is within 11 <br />the Council’s authority and the May 1, 2010, deadline could easily be added to the resolution. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Mueller stated she wants the business to succeed and no jobs lost but her 14 <br />business is in collections and this business owner had already presented a payment plan this past 15 <br />spring that was not followed. To her, this was a broken promise. Council Member Mueller 16 <br />referenced Code sections indicating that a liquor license will not be issued if payments are 17 <br />delinquent and that delinquencies are grounds for revocation or suspension. She felt the 18 <br />revocation of the liquor license would be punitive because not paying the State sales tax already 19 <br />removes the ability to get deliveries of beer and liquor. She felt the first priority for Moe’s was 20 <br />to bring State sales tax current because all assume if beer and liquor is not served, there will not 21 <br />be a lot of restaurant business. However, not all diners drink beer or liquor so it would not 22 <br />entirely shut down this operation. Mr. Moritko stated he does not want to speculate but thinks 23 <br />the banquet business currently booked is based on having a bar available. He stated they stocked 24 <br />up on liquor, wine, and bottled beer but currently they do not have keg beer available. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Council Member Mueller recommend the Council verify the sales tax is paid within 45 days and 27 <br />look again at progress made by January 1, 2010. She felt that if substantial progress had not been 28 <br />made by that date, there was no sense to prolong the extension to May 1, 2010. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Mr. Moritko stated they have earmarked close to $17,000, will bring sales tax current, and will 31 <br />pay $7,500 in December toward the property taxes. He asked if that will be considered 32 <br />“substantial progress.” The Council indicated it would. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson suggested language to revise the resolution that would require the 35 <br />owner to provide monthly documentation to the City. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Stigney stated he also wants an update on the bank financing by January 1, 38 <br />2010, so things do not drag on. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Council Member Mueller stated it is unusual to consider a second extension but she believes Mr. 41 <br />Moritko is a good community partner, supports the community festival, high school band, 42 <br />pancake breakfast, and invested over $1 million in the community. She stated she hopes things 43 <br />turn around for all Mounds View businesses. 44 <br /> 45