Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No:11(B)1 <br />Meeting Date: April 14, 2008 <br />Type of Business: Reports <br />Administrator Review: ___ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Xcel Energy Gas Transmission Line through City <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />As the City Council is aware, the City and Xcel are at somewhat of an impasse regarding <br />Xcel’s proposed installation of a natural gas transmission line through the City. At issue were <br />easements, route and an automatic shut-off valve. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Xcel began installing the transmission line last year within the County Road 10 right of way <br />under a permit issued by Ramsey County. The City of Mounds View also issued a permit for <br />utility work within our right of way, however Xcel did not act on the permit and it subsequently <br />expired. One of the conditions of the permit approval was that Xcel would need to install an <br />automatic shut-off valve in addition to the manual shut-off. Xcel has indicated they would <br />install an automatic shut-off valve but only at the City’s expense. <br /> <br />Xcel installed the manual shut-off valve on City-owned land last year, without the permission <br />or grant of easement from the City. Through Kennedy & Graven, the City again asked Xcel <br />to install the automatic shut-off valve at THEIR expense, or, compensate the City for the <br />easement in an amount equivalent to the cost of the desired automatic valve. <br /> <br />Xcel has responded by noting that the northern route of the pipeline would be changing to <br />take advantage of street reconstruction work which will already be disrupting the area and <br />then also noted that in terms of the automatic shut-off valve, the City is left with a choice— <br />either accept fair market compensation for the easement needed or they will simply remove <br />the manual shut-off valve altogether, not replacing it anywhere else. The following statement <br />is from their letter, which is attached for the Council’s review: <br /> <br />“Although the system without a valve will still comply with all applicable codes and <br />regulations, the flexibility and other benefits provided by the valve (most of which inure to the <br />benefit of the residents of the City) will be lost.” <br /> <br />Staff has discussed the letter with Bob Vose of Kennedy & Graven, who points out that the <br />City can either agree to their terms (one way or another) or simply hold firm to the position <br />that as a condition of permit issuance, the automatic shut off valve is required to be installed <br />at Xcel’s expense. <br />