My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2008/06/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agenda Packets - 2008/06/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:36 PM
Creation date
7/5/2018 7:59:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/23/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/23/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Actions Available to City: <br />Following are the primary options available to the City at this time: <br />Reject All Bids, Re-Advertise the Project, and Receive New Bids In 2008 <br />The City Council could reject all bids since they exceeded the Engineer’s <br />Estimate, re-advertise the project, and receive new bids in approximately one <br />month. This would be the appropriate action if there was reason to believe that <br />lower prices would be received with the new bids. <br />The seal coat work to be performed as part of the 2008 Street Maintenance <br />Project is fairly specialized work, and there are only a limited number of <br />contractors who perform the work. It is therefore unlikely that the amount of <br />competition would greatly increase under a re-bid scenario. Only three bids were <br />received on the 2007 Street Maintenance Project, and the two bidders on the <br />2008 Street Maintenance Project were the two lowest on the 2007 project. <br />Furthermore, if the price of crude oil were to drop at all during 2008, it would <br />almost certainly not happen until after Labor Day. MnDOT specifications <br />recommend that seal coat operations be completed by August 31st. Therefore, it <br />is unlikely that the price of the oil used in the seal coat operation would be lower <br />if the project were re-bid. <br />Given these facts, Staff does not recommend rejecting the bids and re-bidding <br />the project in 2008. <br />Reject All Bids, Cancel the 2008 Street Maintenance Project and Reschedule the <br />Project for 2009 or 2010 <br />The City Council could reject all bids since they exceeded the Engineer’s <br />Estimate, and simply cancel the 2008 Street Maintenance Project. The streets <br />scheduled to be seal coated in 2008 could be delayed until 2009 or possibly even <br />2010 without significant detriment. Therefore, this may be a viable option if there <br />was reason to believe that oil prices will drop within the next 12 to 24 months. <br />However, there are two noteworthy drawbacks to this action. First, the City is <br />speculating as to whether the price of oil and other construction materials will fall <br />over the next 12 to 24 months. Staff has not seen any indications in the <br />economic forecasts to expect that to be the case. Second, there would be no <br />tangible or physical benefit achieved from the amount the City has invested in <br />developing the project to date, which is approximately $16,500. <br />Accept the Bids, Award the Construction Contract, and Proceed With the Work <br />The City Council could accept the bids and recognize that while the low bid is <br />higher than anticipated, the estimated total project costs will still be within the <br />approved 2008 budget. In addition, this work would complete all seal coat <br />operations within Mounds View until 2012 or 2013. Finally, immediate physical <br />return on the funds invested in the project development would be achieved.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.