My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-2008 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
09-08-2008 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:55 PM
Creation date
7/5/2018 10:39:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/8/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/8/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Select Senior Living Staff Report <br />August 25, 2008 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Presently: <br />The development site has an area of 2.38 acres, is located on County Road 10 and Groveland <br />Road and currently has mixed zoning designations. The property at 2865 County Highway 10 is <br />zoned R-O, Residential/Office and is currently being used as a single family home. 7980 and 8020 <br />Groveland Road are both currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential with a house on each lot. <br /> <br />Select Senior Living is requesting a rezoning of the identified parcels to an R-4, High Density <br />Residential designation. The R-4 zoning designation would permit single family dwellings, <br />twinhomes and townhomes up to 8 units. Senior congregate housing, schools, churches, day care <br />centers and other multiple family developments require City Council approval of a conditional use <br />permit (CUP) in an R-4 district. <br /> <br />Rezoning Criteria: <br />Chapter 1125 of the Mounds View Zoning Code addresses rezoning requests. The procedure and <br />conditions of approval are the same as for conditional use permits, which means the Planning <br />Commission and City Council are to consider possible and potential adverse effects of the <br />requested rezoning. The Planning Commission shall make a finding of fact and make a <br />recommendation to the City Council based upon the review of potential adverse effects and the <br />findings of fact. <br /> <br />Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan <br />According to the Comprehensive Plan, the city has designated the site as a mixed-use planned <br />unit development. This is defined as land containing a building or buildings with significant <br />amounts of residential uses in combination with commercial and/or office uses. Sites with this <br />designation could be developed as planned unit developments (PUDs) to allow flexibility, but not all <br />development areas will meet the minimum size criteria. As I noted above, this is the case with this <br />proposal. One of the key components of the Comprehensive Plan, the Housing Element, is geared <br />toward maintaining and improving the quality and diversity of the existing housing stock and <br />providing infill housing opportunities where both possible and practical. The proposed rezoning <br />would help promote a greater diversity of housing choices in the city, as it would help allow the <br />applicant’s requested senior housing development proposal. <br /> <br />Geographical Area <br />The subject area proposed for redevelopment currently consists of three single family homes, (one <br />formerly also operated a trailer hitch business on the property). Adjacent to the west and north are <br />two vacant parcels zoned B-3 and R-1, which are also expected to be redeveloped. The properties <br />to the northeast of the subject parcels are zoned R-1, single family residential, and are developed <br />as such. Properties on County Highway 10 tend to be developed to a greater intensity, whether <br />commercial or residential, than in other parts of the city. Directly east of the project area across <br />Groveland Road is Steve’s Appliance, zoned B-3, and south of the project area across County <br />Highway 10 are two townhome developments. <br /> <br />Depreciation <br />The question of depreciation is a difficult one to answer with any quantifiable certainty. Most <br />studies that examine property value impacts of development generally find little correlation <br />between a well designed and constructed project and subsequent property values. While property <br />values may not depreciate as a result of the development, one can argue that quality of life for the <br />existing residents that would be adjacent to the project could be negatively impacted. From the <br />Select Senior Living Staff Report
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.