My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2008/09/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agenda Packets - 2008/09/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:06 PM
Creation date
7/5/2018 10:42:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/22/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/22/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Driveway widths and setbacks <br />Current City Code allows a maximum driveway width of 24 feet within the public <br />right of way and a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet. <br />The December 2006 feasibility report found a number of existing driveways that <br />did not meet the Code requirements. The recommendation of the feasibility <br />report was that these driveways should be brought into compliance with the <br />Code, if possible, as part of the street improvement project. <br />Discussion: <br />At their meeting of August 18, 2008, the Streets and Utilities Committee <br />discussed the issue of non-conforming driveways. Staff prepared a memo to <br />provide the information from the City Code and to present the recommendations <br />from feasibility report on the previously proposed 2007-2008 street project. <br />The Committee generally expressed support for the recommendations from the <br />feasibility report. The Committee further recommended that in instances where <br />driveway widths could not be brought into conformance with the Code (i.e. a <br />driveway needed to be constructed wider than the 24-foot maximum width), all <br />costs related to constructing the driveway wider than 24 feet be the responsibility <br />of the property owner. <br />The Committee passed a motion (by a 5-1 vote) recommending the following: <br />x that the property owner be 100% responsible for the costs of a second <br />driveway access, and <br />x that the property owner be 100% responsible for all costs required to <br />construct a driveway above and beyond the maximum 24-foot width, <br />where approved by Staff. <br />Per City Code, only properties with multiple accesses prior to adoption of the <br />ordinance would be allowed to keep the additional access, and only if the City did <br />not deem them to be a danger or public safety hazard. Also per Code, <br />unimproved, soil access driveways would not be allowed as a second access. <br />Implementation <br />The new financing plan for the Street and Utility Improvement Program, adopted <br />in October 2007, does not include any direct assessments to properties. <br />Therefore, if the recommendations of the Streets and Utilities Committee were to <br />be implemented, a method would need to be developed to allow the City to <br />assign the costs of the driveway improvements to the property owner. <br />Staff recommends that a signed agreement should be entered into between the <br />City and each property owner who is approved to keep a multiple driveway or an <br />extra-wide driveway. The agreement should be entered into before construction <br />occurs. The agreement would serve the following purposes:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.