My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2008/11/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agenda Packets - 2008/11/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:02 PM
Creation date
7/5/2018 11:03:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/8/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/8/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Stormwater Infiltration Program <br />Staff Response to Appeal <br />2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project <br />Property Address:2756 Sherwood Road <br />Basis for Appeal:Other <br />Date of Appeal:October 29, 2008 <br />Date of Appeal Hearing:November 10, 2008 <br />Staff Recommendation:Denial <br />Basis for Staff Recommendation: <br />The property owner has not presented any objective supporting information for <br />their appeal. They have only stated personal reservations regarding the long-term <br />impacts of the infiltration features, and their desire to not have one adjacent to <br />their property. <br />The property owner states their supposition regarding groundwater flow. There is <br />no evidence to support a claim that the infiltration feature will result in water <br />seepage into the basement of the home. The feature will be designed to accept <br />only a limited amount of water volume. If during a rainfall event the design <br />capacity of the feature is exceeded, the excess water will flow back into the gutter <br />of the street and will be collected by the storm sewer <br />Based on the above discussion, it is the conclusion of Staff that the standard for <br />upholding the appeal has not been met.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.