Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance 804 Report <br />Nov 10, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />October 6, 2008 City Council Work Session <br />During the Work Session discussion the City Council raised several comments <br />on the proposed ordinance and associated documents. The following list <br />summarizes the revisions that have been made to address Council comments: <br /> <br />1. 1303.07 Subd. 3: City inspection required prior to releasing any portion of <br />the financial security. <br />2. 1303.08 Subd. 1: The criteria for allowing Council review of the land <br />disturbance permit has been reduced from 5 acres to 3 acres. <br />3. 1303.09 Subd. 2&3: Consistent use of the term “time period” throughout. <br />4. The Land Disturbance and Implementation Plan Requirements document <br />has been updated to reflect the new MPCA Construction Stormwater <br />Permit and new Rice Creek Watershed District Rules <br /> <br />It is also noted that questions were raised during the Work Session discussion <br />regarding the expiration language contained in Section 1303.06 Subd. 3 of the <br />ordinance. However, it is the understanding of Staff that the questions were <br />resolved during the discussion and no revision to the ordinance language was <br />necessary. <br /> <br />October 27, 2008 Council Meeting <br />During the meeting, the City Council made additional comments on the proposed <br />ordinance and associated documents. The following list summarizes the <br />revisions that have been made to Ordinance 804 to address Council comments: <br /> <br />1. Question about the start time and end date of the work, how long might <br />we have to look at mounds of dirt if there is no action. The application and <br />ordinance has been modified to include approximate start dates and <br />anticipated end dates. While the ordinance does allow for inaction up to <br />180 days, if conditions are in violation of the regulations, the City can take <br />immediate action to request correction. <br />2. 1303.07, Subd 3b6: The Council observed that NPDES is noted in this <br />paragraph but is not defined until the next page. This was revised. <br />3. 1303.08, Subd 1. The Council indicated it wanted the permissive review <br />removed and replaced with mandatory review by Council. While this has <br />been revised as directed, I'm not sure the Council truly desires to review <br />and approve technical grading, drainage, stormwater management and <br />erosion control site plans. <br /> <br />As a result of our internal review of Section 1303.08, a number of revisions were <br />made to clarify when and by whom such plans are required and reviewed. The <br />word “subdivision” was replaced with “project” and “city” was clarified to mean <br />either the Council or Staff. <br /> <br />