Laserfiche WebLink
Distributed Monday, June 14, 1993 <br /> . .: Agenda Section: 9.0 <br /> �� � REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number. 91-5 �C <br /> Report Date: h-11-93 <br /> STAFF REPORT Council Action: <br /> 411 0 Special Order of Business <br /> June 14, 19 9 3 0 Public Hearings <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE p Consent Agenda <br /> lD Council Business <br /> Item Description: Consideration of Resolution No. 4376 Authorizing the Execution of the Oakgrove <br /> Sanitary Landfill COnsent Decree, Amended and Restated Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill Site Trust <br /> Agreement and Authorize Settlement Amounts <br /> Administrators Review/Recommendation: <br /> - No comments to supplement this report <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> TTMMARY; <br /> In 1980, the Oak Grove Landfill was listed as an EPA Super Fund site <br /> under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and <br /> Liability Act (CERCLA) . In August 1987, the MN Pollution Control Agency <br /> (MPCA) completed a draft Remedial Investigation Report and Feasibility <br /> Study which outlined the proposed plan for remedial action for the <br /> clean-up of the site. <br /> In 1991, EPA began the process of naming all "Potentially Responsible <br /> • Parties" (PRP) who had generated or transported (or both) waste to the <br /> site which may have contributed to the contamination of the site. The <br /> City of Mounds View was named by the EPA as one of the PRPs. <br /> As part of the Administrative Discovery process, the City released all <br /> known information as to the type and volume of Municipal Solid Waste <br /> (MSW) that the City had transported to the site during the late 1960's <br /> through the early 1980's. All evidence indicated that the only type of <br /> MSW that the City had transported to the site had been a handful of <br /> loads of brush and logs. However, because one of the trip tickets to the <br /> site did not specify the type of load, the City could not prove that the - <br /> load contained only brush or logs. The consequence of our inability to <br /> prove the loads of MSW transported to the site did not contain hazardous <br /> waste, the City remained a PRP and therefore responsible for a portion <br /> of the clean-up costs. <br /> Over the past two years, the City, together with the other local units <br /> of government named as PRPs, has worked very hard to secure a de minimis <br /> settlement with EPA rather than become part of the private sector PRP <br /> group (which would have resulted in higher settlement costs to the <br /> City) . <br /> Samanth Orduno, City dministrator <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> Motion to waive the reading and approve Resolution No. 4376 Authorizing the Execution of the Oak Grove <br /> Sanitary Landfill Consent Decree, Amended and Restated Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill Site Trust Agreement and <br /> Authorize Settlement Amounts with Payments to be Made from the Undesignated Fund Balance <br />