Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 8. <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: 93-496WS <br /> �� ° <br /> AGENDA SESSION DATE May 3, 1993 Report Date: 4-29-93 <br /> DISPOSITION <br /> Item Description: Discussion of County Plans for Rehabilitation of Spring Lake Road and <br /> Pleasant View Drive <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> No comments to supplement this report + 'v <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> SUMMARY; <br /> Ramsey County is planning to rehabilitate Spring Lake Road and Pleasantview <br /> Drive this summer. The type of rehabilitation is referred to as "In Place <br /> Recycling" . This consists of pulverising the existing asphalt pavement, <br /> mixing it with the existing aggregate base, regrading the road cross <br /> section and finally placing a new asphalt surface. The county would pay 100 <br /> peecent of the cost to recycle and overlay the travel lanes and the <br /> shoulders. <br /> Alternatively, the City could opt to use the funds toward reconstruction <br /> of the roads. This would need to be a City project and payment would not <br /> be received until a contract was executed for reconstruction. The amount <br /> of the funds would be the amount the County would have expended not <br /> including County provided labor and equipment. <br /> The County has indicated that the City would have to agree to accept the <br /> roads in a "turn back agreement" in order for the County to rehabilitate <br /> the roads or provide the City any funding toward reconstruction. Although <br /> the City could theoretically add these roads to our Municipal State Aid <br /> designated streets, our mileage allotment is nearly filled and to designate <br /> these without an additional allotment would mean taking other MSA <br /> designated streets off the system. The state has not passed the bill which <br /> would give Ramsey County cities additional allotments and it does not <br /> appear that this bill will pass. <br /> The section of Pleasantview under consderation is the western border of the <br /> City and half the road is in Fridley. Fridley has indicated that they are <br /> interested in reconstruction, or at least add curb and gutter and possibly <br /> storm sewer. Fridley has indicated that they will assess their portion of <br /> the cost of the project. Mounds View would have the choice of also <br /> upgrading these roads or simply accepting the extent of the County's work. <br /> Upgrading the roads would cost approximately $100, 000. This could be <br /> assessed back to the fronting properties, or charged against the street <br /> maintenance account. The street maintenance account has $125, 000 for this <br /> year and this would effectively eliminate any seal coats or overlays. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> Ric Minet'r, rirector of Public Works/City Engineer <br />