My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-07-1992 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
12-07-1992 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:33 PM
Creation date
7/9/2018 6:30:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/7/1993
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/7/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 8. <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: 92-425WS <br /> 111706 <br /> AGENDA SESSION DATE December 7, 1992 Report Date: 12-3-92 <br /> DISPOSITION <br /> Item Description: Support of State Legislation to Allow <br /> Cities to Establish Transportation Utilities <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> - No comments to supplement this report <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> SUMMARY: <br /> The League of Minnesota Cities and several individual Cities are <br /> supporting legislation to allow cities to create transportation <br /> utilities. This is an effort to give cities flexibility in deter- <br /> mining the method of funding street reconstruction, facility <br /> upgrades and maintenance. The request is for legislation that <br /> would enable, not require, cities to utilize the concept of a <br /> utility as a means to finance infrastructure repair. Attached is <br /> a draft document prepared by the Minnesota Public Works Associa- <br /> tion in conjunction with the League of Minnesota Cities describ- <br /> ing the concept and application of a transportation utility. <br /> The need for an alternative funding source for transportation <br /> infrastructure is based on restrictions in current funding sourc- <br /> es. The 2 basic sources of funds for these projects are property <br /> taxes and special assessments. Property taxes have been con- <br /> strained by levy limits in the past and may again be constrained <br /> in the future. Also the cost of the infrastructure projects are <br /> determined for each taxpayer by the value of the property, not <br /> the benefit derived from projects. Non-property tax paying enti- <br /> ties do not contribute toward the project, even though they may <br /> derive great benefits or contribute significantly to the need. <br /> Special assessments are restricted by state law to the amount of <br /> benefit to each property. This is a reasonable concept, but in <br /> reality is determined by the before and after property values. <br /> Many types of infrastructure projects do not increase the proper- <br /> ty value in question. Projects such as seal coats, overlays, <br /> traffic signals, and turn lanes and similar projects would be <br /> difficult to show increases in property Values yet the benefits <br /> to properties are considerable. <br /> - continued - <br /> i <br /> Ric ine or <br /> City Engineer/Director of Public Works <br /> Staff recommends that Council consider a resolu- <br /> RECOMMENDATIONs tion to support state legislation allowing cities <br /> to establish transportation utilities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.