Agenda Packets - 1993/07/26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4gounds View City Council Page Eleven egular Meeting July 26, 1993 ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke - yes Councilmember Blanchard yes Councilmember Wuori - yes 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried C. Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-565C regarding the bid award for paving of Silver View Park Path. Saarion reported that the City had been awarded a Lawcon grant for the paving of the path at Silver View Park. This grant was in the amount of $25,000. The City was given the okay to go ahead with the project in mid -June. Bids were opened August 26, 1993 and the low bidder, was Bituminous Consulting and Contracting at $14,840. Saarion checked references and all references reported that this company performed quality work. Saarion asked that the Council also consider the paving of an additional lineal footage of pathway with a not to exceed amount of $25,000. The additional lineal footage would pave from the from the parking lot to Silver Lake Road connection and increase the restoration of the path. • Councilmember Wuori asked about the bridge over the ditch. Saarion stated that the City has submitted two grants (ISTEA) for funding for the bridge. This additional paving would leave a 30 to 50 foot span over the ditch open. The trail would be finished in anticipation of having the bridge at some date. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to Accept the Bid from Bitumious Consulting and Authorize Staff to Work with Bituminous Consultants for Additional Linear Footage of Pathway and Sodding Along Existing Footage not to Exceed $25,000 VOTE: 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried D. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-566C regarding the continued discussion of a request for Conditional Use Permit/Variance for Gateway Foods, 2390 Highway 10. Harrington reported that at the July 12, 1993, City Council Meeting, staff and the City Attorney were directed by the Council to draft a resolution of denial for the requested variance at 2390 Highway 10. Following this decision, the applicant decided to relocate the structure on the property. Harrington stated that he sees no problem in reviewing the alternative site plan and is asking Council to refer the request back to the Planning Commission level. No formal action is necessary by the City Council. • Council agreed to direct this request for an alternative site for the car wash back to the Planning Commission level.