Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 4 • <br /> %NOS 93-468WS <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: <br /> CMu° February 1, 1993' Report Date: 1/28/93 <br /> AGENDA SESSION DATE <br /> DISPOSITION <br /> Item Description: <br /> Residential Driveway Sideyard Setback <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: C <br /> 1v-\ <br /> - No comments to supplement this report <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> ,SUMMARYt <br /> At their October 21, 1992 meeting, the Planning Commission - per City <br /> Council direction - reviewed the City setback requirements for improved, <br /> off-street parking areas. Following discussion, it was the determination <br /> of the Commission that the existing side yard setback (5' for improved <br /> parking surfaces) was appropriate and reasonable. <br /> Attached you will find Planning Commission Resolution No. 354-92 which <br /> recommends that the existing 5 foot sideyard setback requirement be <br /> maintained. Specifically, the Planning Commission cited the potential for <br /> impervious surface to be located over areas designated as utility easements <br /> and, the elimination of snow storage area as reasons for not wanting any <br /> further encroachment upon the sideyard setback. <br /> Discussion of this item is in response to resident requests for additional <br /> off-street parking area due to the enactment of the City-wide, 2 a.m. to <br /> 6 a.m. , parking ban. <br /> Paul Harrington, City Planner <br /> RECOMMENDATIONz <br />