My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-1993 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
01-25-1993 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:04 PM
Creation date
7/9/2018 7:06:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/25/1993
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/25/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Five <br /> •gular Meeting January 25, 1993 <br /> Mayor Linke stated that he concurred with Councilmember Rickaby's <br /> concern regarding the hardship that property owners would incur and <br /> that perhaps the ordinance should read, "with the exception of directly <br /> adjacent to owners' driveway. " <br /> Councilmember Wuori asked if a difference in policy could legally be <br /> adopted to differentiate between commercial property and residential <br /> property. <br /> Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked what is going to be done with <br /> the snow on Long Lake Road. Mr. Frits stated that a homeowner further <br /> down Long Lake Road has timber that comes down to the lot and easement <br /> line and is approximately 4 to 4 1/2 feet high. The Council promised <br /> the snow would be removed from the sidewalk and Mr. Frits hopes that <br /> this happens. The 4 to 4 1/2 foot high wall is too high to throw snow <br /> over so the snow would have to be hauled away. <br /> Mayor Linke stated that he doesn't know the distance between the wall <br /> and the sidewalk and that this isn't the issue at hand. <br /> Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, asked how ,many feet was available <br /> adjacent to the average driveway. How many feet adjacent to a driveway <br /> would a property owner need to store snow? Orduno asked if the <br /> ordinance could read, " . . . in the street, sidewalk or in the first 10 <br /> feet adjacent to a driveway or ingress or egress. <br /> Minetor replied 10 feet. Minetor stated that if the City allows snow <br /> storage on the boulevards it is taking snow storage space away from <br /> itself and it would cost the City more money to load snow out of those <br /> areas. <br /> Councilmember Quick stated that the snow from the sidewalk can <br /> be piled so high and then it falls back onto the sidewalk and, <br /> therefore, has to be moved back into yard. Councilmember Quick stated <br /> that, in his opinion, the ordinance is written correctly. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby stated that the Council is discussing a very <br /> sensitive issue because people objected to the sidewalks in the <br /> beginning and now the City is adding another hardship by having the <br /> property owners haul the snow. <br /> Alice Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated her solution would be <br /> to eliminate the sidewalks. <br /> Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, asked how many city streets fit the <br /> description in this ordinance? The way the ordinance reads, whether <br /> there is a sidewalk or not, there is to be no snow on the boulevards. <br /> Mayor Linke stated that the purpose of the ordinance is to keep people <br /> from depositing snow on other property without permission of the <br /> property owner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.