Agenda Packets - 1993/09/27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Page Three September 27, 1993 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 05 p.m. Consideration of C U P. - Donald Pederson 8368 Spring Lake Rd. Mayor Linke opened the public hearing for the consideration of a Conditional Use Permit (oversized accessory building), Donald Pederson, 8368 Spring Lake Road at 7:13 p.m. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed Staff Report No. 93-624C stating that the applicant had made application for a 20 ft. x 20 ft. oversized structure on the aforementioned property. Harrington reported that this structure meets the requirements of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Harrington further reported that the Planning Commission approved the request and recommended approval. Harrington stated that he was asking the Council to adopt Resolution No. 4421 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building at 8368 Spring Lake Road There were no comments or questions by other Councilmembers or residents. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4421 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building at 8368 Spring Lake Road VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke continued the public hearing to consider the revocation of a previously approved Conditional Use Permit for John Engberg, 3030 County Road J at 7:16 p.m. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reported that staff had received a letter from the property owner's attorney contending that the garage in question was built in 1987, at which time a Conditional Use Permit would have not been necessary for its construction. Harrington reported that he had ccisulted with the City's Attorney and was advised to have Mr. Engberg provide evidence supporting his claim. Mr. Engberg provided the City with canceled checks. Harrington reported that staff is in the process of contacting those parties named on the checks as payees to verify that the goods or services rendered were in regards to the structure in question. Dave Kennedy. City Attorney, stated that the applicant must provide sufficient documentation to support the fact that the garage was built prior to 1988. If the City is not satisfied with the documentation provided, the City could proceed with revocation proceedings.