Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> PAGE TWO <br /> SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 <br /> the street light costs were on the property taxes, the cost <br /> would increase. A utility rate is not dependent on property <br /> values or property tax increases. Rates are generally held <br /> constant. <br /> The utility provides funding for new street lights, repairs <br /> and maintenance costs. Without the utility, the City may not <br /> be able to fund new lights or keep up with adequate repairs. <br /> Please see Attachment 1 which compares the utility vs. <br /> property tax on the projected 1994 annual revenues collected - <br /> $75, 000. Please note that the property tax figure is based on <br /> 1993 tax rates. If the tax rates increase in 1994, so does the <br /> amounts paid by the different property classes. <br /> 4. How many street lights have been installed since the utility <br /> began? <br /> A: Six <br /> 5. How many street lights does the City really need to have <br /> installed? <br /> A: Five years ago, an informal study conducted by theM.V. Police <br /> Department concluded that the City would need an additional <br /> 100 street lights to provide the maximum amount of safety. <br /> Since that time, 11 street lights have been installed. <br /> At the time the Street Light Utility was implemented, staff <br /> presented a "best guess" estimate in regards to the costs <br /> associated with the utility. At that time NSP was before the PUC <br /> requesting a rate increase, the State was talking about imposing <br /> sales tax on cities and the City was considering a franchise fee on <br /> gas and electricity. All of those things became reality and <br /> impacted the amount of money the City spends for street lights - we <br /> pay sales tax on the electricity at a higher rate than before, and <br /> we also pay the 3% franchise fee. <br /> If the City were to sunset the street light utility, the <br /> expenditures for street lights would be folded into the General <br /> Fund. We could reduce the expenditures by not providing funding for <br /> new lights, replacement of lights and only minor repairs. The <br /> financial impact to the property tax payer would be more or less <br /> than the utility fee (depending on property value) , but it would <br /> not remain constant in the future - NSP rate increases are granted <br /> about every three years and, as much as we try to keep a lid on it, <br /> property taxes generally go up thereby increasing the per property <br /> amount paid for street lights. <br />