My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1993/09/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Agenda Packets - 1993/09/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:53 PM
Creation date
7/9/2018 7:40:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/7/1993
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/7/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br /> PAGE TWO <br /> SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 <br /> the street light costs were on the property taxes, the cost <br /> would increase. A utility rate is not dependent on property <br /> values or property tax increases. Rates are generally held <br /> constant. <br /> The utility provides funding for new street lights, repairs <br /> and maintenance costs. Without the utility, the City may not <br /> be able to fund new lights or keep up with adequate repairs. <br /> Please see Attachment 1 which compares the utility vs. <br /> property tax on the projected 1994 annual revenues collected - <br /> $75, 000. Please note that the property tax figure is based on <br /> 1993 tax rates. If the tax rates increase in 1994, so does the <br /> amounts paid by the different property classes. <br /> 4. How many street lights have been installed since the utility <br /> began? <br /> A: Six <br /> 5. How many street lights does the City really need to have <br /> installed? <br /> A: Five years ago, an informal study conducted by theM.V. Police <br /> Department concluded that the City would need an additional <br /> 100 street lights to provide the maximum amount of safety. <br /> Since that time, 11 street lights have been installed. <br /> At the time the Street Light Utility was implemented, staff <br /> presented a "best guess" estimate in regards to the costs <br /> associated with the utility. At that time NSP was before the PUC <br /> requesting a rate increase, the State was talking about imposing <br /> sales tax on cities and the City was considering a franchise fee on <br /> gas and electricity. All of those things became reality and <br /> impacted the amount of money the City spends for street lights - we <br /> pay sales tax on the electricity at a higher rate than before, and <br /> we also pay the 3% franchise fee. <br /> If the City were to sunset the street light utility, the <br /> expenditures for street lights would be folded into the General <br /> Fund. We could reduce the expenditures by not providing funding for <br /> new lights, replacement of lights and only minor repairs. The <br /> financial impact to the property tax payer would be more or less <br /> than the utility fee (depending on property value) , but it would <br /> not remain constant in the future - NSP rate increases are granted <br /> about every three years and, as much as we try to keep a lid on it, <br /> property taxes generally go up thereby increasing the per property <br /> amount paid for street lights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.