Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 3' <br /> OUNDsS Report Number:Fi <br /> 93-637WS <br /> STAFF REPORT <br /> AGENDA SESSION DATE <br /> �CG�° October 4, 1993 Report Date: 9-30-93 <br /> - <br /> DISPOSITION <br /> Item Description: Consideration of Street Light Utility Rates <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation:,---- ;,_,,,� <br /> - No comments to supplement this repprt <br /> f <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> ,ST JMMARY; <br /> At the September 27, 1993 , Regular City Council meeting, Ordinance No. 528, <br /> an ordinance that would repeal the sunset portion of the Street Light <br /> Utility, was adopted by the Council. As is annually the case with <br /> municipal utilities, it is time to reexamine the rate structure to <br /> determine if the rates are set at a level that is fair and reasonable yet <br /> enables the City to operate this Utility in a financially sound manner. <br /> Presented to you for your consideration are several options pertaining to <br /> the Street Light Utility's rate structure. There are five scenarios <br /> included that offer a range of possible rates. With each scenario, the <br /> rates decrease at a 8-9% average to help visualize the impact that <br /> decreasing revenues would have on the Street Light Utility's fund balance. <br /> Also, the expenses in each scenario are constant but show inflation <br /> increases from one year to the next for 5 years. The electricity account <br /> reflects a 5% rate increase each year and the installations, maintenance <br /> and administration accounts reflect a 3% increase each year. <br /> In all of the scenarios, the revenue remains the same for 1992 and 1993 <br /> because the rates were set for those two years. It is the years 1994-98 <br /> ---that-are-being-considered. For example, Scenario#1 examines-the—impact <br /> of no change in the existing rates. If the expenses are accurate (the <br /> increases are only guesses) , the Utility will start using fund balance to <br /> finance the Street Light Utility operations by 1997. Scenario #2 proposes <br /> a 9% decrease in revenues compared to the existing rates and reveals that <br /> fund balance begins to be used in 1994 to help balance the Street Light <br /> Utility budget. Scenario #3 reduces revenues another 9% and shows that <br /> fund balance is also being used to balance this budget in 1994, but using <br /> more fund balance to do so than Scenario #2 . Scenario #4 decreases <br /> revenues another 9% and spends down fund balance even faster. Scenario #5 <br /> cuts the existing rates in half and decreases the fund balance by $30, 000 <br /> in one year. <br /> 14i1)Ak <br /> RECOMMENDATION; Tim Cruikshank, Asst. to City Admin. <br />