My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2015/08/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
Agenda Packets - 2015/08/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:21 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 12:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/3/2015
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 5 <br />Meeting Date: August 3, 2015 <br />Type of Business: Work Session <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Discuss Options Associated with Pursuing Organized <br />Collection <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />At the May 4, 2015, Work Session, the City Council expressed support to staff to begin <br />researching the steps necessary to pursue a system of organized collection in the City of <br />Mounds View. The detailed process for migrating from an open system to an organized <br />system is addressed in Minnesota Statutes Section 115A.94, included for your reference at <br />the end of this report. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The Minnesota Legislature adopted significant changes to the organized collection statute <br />in 2013 that were designed to simplify the process for adopting organized collection. While <br />there are essentially five steps for migrating to a system of organized collection, cities that <br />consider such a system utilize a variety of different tools, procedures and actions to reach <br />their final decision. Cities may also engage in significant research, opinion surveying, open <br />houses and listening sessions to help determine whether there is sufficient support to <br />move to a system of organized collection. In addition, because of the complexities <br />associated with contract negotiations, terms and conditions, many cities have found it <br />necessary to engage an attorney or consultant (or both) to assist with the process. <br />Naturally, there are costs for the additional prep work and outside assistance which, <br />depending upon the direction of the Council, may need to be factored into the 2016 <br />Budget. <br /> <br />The formal steps for migrating to an organized collection system are as follows: <br />1. Notice to public and to licensed collectors <br />2. 60-day negotiation period with licensed collectors <br />3. Organized collection options committee <br />4. Public notice and public hearing <br />5. Implementation. <br /> There are many sub-steps and actions required for each of the above steps (for a more <br />detailed summary, refer to the attachment following this report). While the above five steps <br />may seem fairly straightforward, the Council may want to gauge the level of community <br />support for such an endeavor before formally initiating the process, and it will need to <br />establish some priorities and talking points which would be referenced during the <br />negotiation period. If, as a result of the negotiation period, a suitable agreement is not <br />reached, the City would then create the organized collection options committee (OCOC) so <br />there should be some thought as to the possible composition of such a group. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.