My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2015/08/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
Agenda Packets - 2015/08/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:21 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 12:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/3/2015
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Organized Collection Report <br />August 3, 2015 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Public feedback: <br /> <br />The Council will need to advise staff on the extent and manner to which public feedback <br />will be sought. Naturally each of the meetings identified above will serve as an opportunity <br />for residents to provide input and feedback, but more proactive steps can be taken. A few <br />possible ways to solicit input and feedback are listed as follows: <br /> <br />• Ask residents to fill out an online survey (e.g., Survey Monkey) <br />• Ask residents to mail in a feedback form <br />• Contract with a firm to conduct a statistically valid phone survey <br />• Hold an informal listening session or open house <br />• Schedule a public hearing before setting the 60-day period <br />• Send flyer in the utility bills, ask for feedback <br />• Ask residents to voluntarily report their garbage rates <br />• Ask residents how much service they would like <br />• Create a PSA that runs on the cable channel <br />• Create an email list for “project” updates and feedback <br />• Newsletter articles. <br /> <br />Budget Impacts: <br /> <br />The amount of staff time that would be needed to coordinate such a project as Organized <br />Collection would be measured in hundreds of hours, if not thousands. While staff time <br />alone will not generally add costs to the budget, devoting such a large block of time over <br />the course of a year will invariably result in other projects being delayed or not being done <br />at all. If the City Council would like to engage in proactive surveying of residents to assess <br />opinions regarding organized collection, this could cost a few thousand dollars. Where the <br />budget would be impacted most is if consultants are used to assist with the process. It is <br />not uncommon to have the City Attorney present at all negotiation sessions and he might <br />be involved in the preparation of the RFP and certainly in the drafting of the contract. <br />Other cities have engaged in specialized consultants with an expertise in organized <br />collection activities. Given the complexities of such a process, it would be prudent to <br />budget as much as $15,000 for legal services and consultant work. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> Review the information presented herein and provide feedback to staff regarding the <br />proposed timeline, the extent to which proactive public feedback would be solicited and <br />how, and then discuss the potential costs (staff time and budgetary) associated with <br />undertaking the organized collection activity. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />City Administrator
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.