Laserfiche WebLink
<br />18 • Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC <br />March 2014 <br />schools and businesses. The relatively low dot ranking priority for the other issues (resource <br />recovery, source reduction and reuse, bulky waste management, landfilling, and managing other <br />problem materials) is more a reflection of the intensity placed on the highly favored strategies <br />related to solid waste collection services and not so much a comment the other issues lack <br />support. All of the strategies in the outline are important elements of the overall Solid Waste <br />Management Plan, but Open House participants may consider these other lower priority issues as <br />something the City should deal with in the longer-term. <br /> <br />8.2 Environmental Protection <br />The community strongly believes in environmental protection. The Bloomington <br />Comprehensive Plan (2008) clearly indicates the City’s history of support for sustainable <br />practices including protection of natural resources and open spaces. The highly engaged and <br />committed volunteers within resident groups such as the Master Recyclers and Composters and <br />the PARC Commission are another indication of community support for sustainability issues <br />such as improved solid waste management. These values were clearly emphasized by <br />participants in the community engagement activities to-date. Environmental protection was a <br />common theme reflected in many of the conversations, responses to surveys and in the <br />comments on the draft goals and outline of strategies. <br /> <br />8.3 Organized Collection <br />The participants in the community engagement process to-date were overwhelmingly supportive <br />of organized solid waste collection as a critical aspect of Bloomington’s future solid waste <br />management efforts. Over and over, participants expressed a desire for fewer trucks in their <br />neighborhoods, less noise, fewer road impacts, more safety and more organized and coordinated <br />waste education and service delivery. There were very few comments supporting continuation of <br />the current open system of trash and recycling collections. <br /> <br />The meeting with the City’s licensed trash haulers and their comments at the first Open House <br />provided important balance as another perspective on the organized collection issue. Each <br />hauling company may have a different opinion about how the City should proceed on this issue, <br />but in general the haulers expressed support for the existing open hauling system. Also, City <br />Council members have expressed an interest in exploring how any change to organized <br />collection could be fair and equitable to existing haulers. Finally, the National Citizen Survey of <br />Bloomington residents clearly indicated a strong majority of respondents are satisfied with solid <br />waste, recycling and yard services provided within the City. <br /> <br />8.4 Educational Opportunities <br />In meetings and in surveys, respondents expressed the belief that increased education efforts are <br />needed to achieve the proposed goals and draft strategies for improved solid waste management. <br />Specific target audience’s recommendations include: school classes, park and athletic field <br />users, multiple unit housing residents, businesses and other residents. Volunteer efforts, <br />however, such as the Master Recyclers and Composters group, have provided some community <br />education. There was significant support for enhanced City-produced recycling and <br />composting-specific articles in the Briefing, in addition to the broad environmental articles that <br />are a staple of the publication.