My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2014/10/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
Agenda Packets - 2014/10/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:24 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 2:09:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/6/2014
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/6/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 2 <br />Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 <br />Type of Business: W orksession <br />Administrator Review : ________ <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Continued Discussion about allowing Tubular Tent <br />Structures in the City <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br />At the August 25, 2014 City Council meeting, a resident approached the City Council to ask <br />why he was not allowed to have a tubular tent structure but someone else could have a <br />greenhouse, which according to this resident, are very similar. The Council agreed to <br />discuss the topic at a Worksession, and did so at the September Worksession meeting. <br />No consensus was determined, so the discussion continues. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />Staff’s concern with these tubular tent structures is that they deteriorate much quicker than <br />a regular shed, particularly if they have a canvas or plastic roof, and whatever is stored <br />underneath the tent is visible and potentially aesthetically displeasing. They are designed <br />to cover a boat or vehicle, but other items tend to accumulate under any type of shelters. <br />And in the winter, tarps end up attached to them to fully enclose the sides. A shed or <br />garage will hide everything inside and the property is much cleaner and visually pleasing. <br />In 2000 and 2009, the Council amended the Zoning Code to specifically not allow these <br />types of structures. These temporary structures tend to get placed next to or in front of the <br />houses and garages, and the Code specifies that all accessory buildings must be placed <br />only in rear yards. Greenhouses were allowed because they have a specific purpose for <br />gardening and are typically fairly small. <br /> <br />Shoreview does not allow these types of structures. They have specific design criteria for <br />accessory buildings and these temporary structures would not meeting those standards. <br />New Brighton requires all accessory structures to meet the building code for snow load and <br />ground anchoring, and temporary accessory structures are not typically able to meet those <br />requirements. Although they did note that some of the styles that are heavy-duty and all <br />metal may possibly be able to meet the building code requirements, so they would consider <br />allowing them. <br /> <br />If the Council is inclined to be more permissive with these temporary structures, staff would <br />suggest that the Zoning Code be amended to only specifically allow ones that are <br />completely metal. Staff also suggests that the Council continue to not allow any use of <br />cloth, canvas, plastic or tarps on accessory structures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.