Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item 04 <br />August 1, 2011, Work Session <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />Options for further funding are often achieved through fundraising by private non-profit <br />groups and donations from the community. This has been the case in the cities of <br />Roseville, St Paul, Blaine and others. The amount generated through this type of means is <br />dependent upon community interest and participation. It would be difficult to estimate how <br />much could potentially be raised to fund a canine program. As an example, a recent event <br />titled as a “pet walk” in the city of Blaine helped raise over $6000 through the efforts of a <br />group formed as a non-profit 501-C3 organization. Further means of achieving funds could <br />also be funded through the police forfeiture fund. <br /> <br />Reducing the original projected cost of $18,000 by the $6000 St Paul K9 Foundation grant <br />leaves approximately $12,000 required to generate through fundraising, donations and <br />forfeiture funds. <br /> <br />There are additional annual costs to anticipate such as overtime pay for the officer and the <br />on-going veterinarian care and food expense for the canine. Vet care and food can expect <br />to total $1500/year, as listed in Table 1. Potential overtime pay for the officer is estimated <br />to run $4000-$8000/year. Most of this cost is due to the additional compensation to the <br />handler for the care of the canine while at home. This is a provision of the Fair Labor <br />Standards Act (FLSA), which requires the handler to receive some form of compensation <br />for the dog care. The Ramsey County Sheriff’s Dept currently pays a canine handler an <br />additional half hour overtime pay to the officer on work days and a full hour overtime pay <br />while on days off. <br /> <br />An alternative arrangement could be based on time where the officer who is scheduled to <br />work 12 hour shifts, is paid for the full 12 hours, but only works 11 hours. The disadvantage <br />with this arrangement, as mentioned previously, is the created schedule gap with coverage. <br />There could also be the possibility of a combination of either type of arrangement. <br />However, this would likely be negotiated through the Law Enforcement Labor Services <br />collective bargaining agreement. <br /> <br />Overtime could be limited by departmental policy addressing what circumstances the <br />canine officer would be called off duty in reporting for work. <br /> <br />The estimated projected annual cost of overtime and canine maintenance expenses could <br />be $5500-$9500 per year. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />The addition of a canine program offers benefits to the police department and community <br />that can only advance the safety, productivity and effectiveness of the department as well <br />as significantly provide a new means of community relationship. <br /> <br />The implementation of a canine program would assist the officers in safe searches and <br />apprehension and offer more efficient methods of narcotic detection. Ownership of a <br />departmental canine would significantly reduce the reliance we have had on other <br />agencies’ canine units. Careful selection of the canine handler and clear policy direction <br />will drive a successful program. <br /> <br /> <br />