My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-06-2011 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
09-06-2011 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:52 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 3:10:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/6/2011
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/6/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 2 <br />Meeting Date: Sept 6, 2011 <br />Type of Business: Work Session <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review Potential City Code Revisions Pertaining to Dynamic <br />Signs <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> The City amended its sign code on January 12, 2009 to include operational requirements <br />and conditions for the use of dynamic display signage with the adoption of Ordinance 816. <br />The ordinance instituted several regulations regarding such signs as well as creating a <br />conversion process by which billboard companies could install a dynamic display billboard <br />face if it removed two-full faces elsewhere in the community. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Since the adoption of the ordinance, it has become evident that that the amount of time <br />that each unique message must be held on dynamic signs was more than necessary. <br />Subdivision 9d(5) of Section 1008.10 states the following: <br /> <br />The owner or operator of a dynamic display sign shall control and <br />display the primary or background images and messages on the sign <br />so they maintain each display for a minimum of ten (10) seconds. <br /> <br />The intent of the ten second hold requirement was to prevent the sign’s message from <br />becoming a distraction to motorists. It has become clear that the hold time is much longer <br />than it needs to be. In this same section, the code provides an allowance for dynamic <br />signs where the background must be held for ten seconds but secondary graphics were <br />allowed to blend in and out of the message in a soft transition. This allowance has been <br />utilized by one area business without incident or complaint. For this reason, staff believes <br />the ten-second hold requirement could be reduced to allow for faster transition between <br />sign impressions without adversely affecting public safety. As a means to assess a more <br />appropriate hold time, messages on the City Hall sign now change every four seconds, <br />which seems reasonable. In our estimation, the minimum hold time should be no less than <br />three seconds. <br /> <br />Billboards <br />In the time that has passed since Ordinance 816 was adopted, many dynamic display <br />billboards have been erected in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Staff is not aware of <br />any incidents or complaints arising from such signs, and it would seem that many of the <br />original concerns expressed regarding the signs have not come to fruition. The Council <br />discussed this point at the August work session and expressed interest in revising the City <br />Code to be more permissive, as the present requirements effectively discourage <br />conversion of a billboard to a dynamic display. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.