Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 1 <br />Meeting Date: Nov 7, 2011 <br />Type of Business: Work Session <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review Red Oak Estates Townhome Development <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The City has been receiving complaints regarding the mounds of dirt that remain on the <br />site of the Red Oak Estates Townhome development, located at the southwest corner of <br />Long Lake Road and County Road H2. In addition to complaints about their unsightly <br />appearance and weed growth, complaints have been filed regarding erosion control and silt <br />collecting on the private internal driveways. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Staff understands that the mounds of dirt were intended to remain in place during the <br />construction of the townhomes on a temporary “staging” basis, representing topsoil to be <br />used on the Red Oak Estates site as well as the future Longview Estates subdivision on <br />Silver Lake Road. Unfortunately, before the topsoil could be utilized, the housing bubble <br />burst, the foreclosure crisis took hold and the great recession intervened, all of which had <br />the effect of halting projects such as Red Oak Estates and Longview Estates. As a result, <br />the mounds of dirt have sat idle for the last two years. Thirty-eight of the development’s <br />seventy-two units have been constructed, with the last units completed in July of 2009. <br /> <br />The mounds of dirt on the property can be considered a violation of both the City’s <br />Nuisance Code (Chapter 607) as well as its Erosion Control Regulations (Chapter 1303, <br />specifically, “Construction and Land Disturbance Run-Off Control.”) In addition to the <br />requirement that no person shall permit weeds or grass to grow to heights in excess of <br />eight inches, the Nuisance Code further states in Section 607.03, Subd 3f., that "Property <br />in a residential district not seeded, sodded or otherwise planted with a ground cover more <br />than two hundred forty (240) days after any disturbance to the property caused by <br />construction, grading, or other activity; or any time prior to the two hundred forty (240) days <br />if the property is causing erosion or drainage problems on the same or nearby properties, <br />including the public streets" shall be considered a public nuisance. <br /> <br />Actions: <br /> <br />The City has notified the property owner previously about the weed growth and we <br />understand that Rice Creek Watershed District has been out to review the property <br />regarding erosion control measures. This last week, the Fire Marshal delivered a letter to <br />the owner in response to complaints about parking and drive-aisle widths, requiring that the <br />internal driveways be maintained at the requisite width and that “No Parking” signs be <br />erected to help maintain such clearance. <br />