Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item 01 <br />Monday, March 1, 2010 Work Session <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> The City Attorney also pointed out that the state statute does <br />not require insurance for the following types of licenses if they <br />submit an affidavit establishing that: <br /> <br />1. They are an On-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licensee <br />with sales of less than $25,000 of 3.2 percent malt <br />liquor for the preceding year; <br /> <br />2. They are Off-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licensee with <br />sales of less than $50,000 of 3.2 percent malt liquor for <br />the preceding year; <br /> <br />3. They are holders of On-Sale Wine licenses with sales of <br />less than $25,000 for wine for the preceding year; <br /> <br />4. They are holders of temporary wine licenses. <br /> <br /> It was the recommendation of the City Attorney that the City <br />Code should also state these exemptions above. <br /> <br />§503.04, subd. 2: No on-sale license shall be issued to any place within fifty feet <br />(50) of any public school or church and no off-sale license shall <br />be issued to any place within five hundred feet (500). Should <br />both the on-sale and off-sale consistent with each other? Why <br />should on-sale be any different than off-sale? <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Please review the items above. Staff would like to address these issues presenting a <br />Liquor Code Amendment for City Council consideration at a future City Council Meeting. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />Desaree Crane <br />Assistant City Clerk - Administrator