My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2010/09/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agenda Packets - 2010/09/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:53 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 3:49:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/7/2010
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/7/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 4 <br />Meeting Date: Sept 7, 2010 <br />Type of Business: Work Session <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review recreational Fire Regulations <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />At the last work session on August 2, the Council held a spirited discussion regarding <br />recreational fires and the impacts of such fires on neighboring property owners. The <br />Spring Lake Park – Blaine – Mounds View Fire Department regulations were reviewed as <br />were policies and regulations from many other cities. The primary issue with the present <br />recreational fire regulations relates to enforcement. The secondary issue is the impact of <br />one neighbor’s recreational fire upon another neighbor. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />For the most part, the Council and those residents who expressed concern about such fires <br />acknowledge that greater enforcement is needed to dissuade residents from violating the <br />regulations. Deputy Chief Kinney along with Fire Chief Zikmund also acknowledge issues <br />at the dispatch level, but for the most part the police department typically responds to such <br />complaints, although the response time will vary depending upon other calls or activity. <br />Rarely do residents or responsible parties receive a citation for violating the recreation fire <br />guidelines, primarily because such guidelines are not articulated in City Code. When a <br />citation is issued, often this is generated through the Code Enforcement officer after <br />receiving an incident report from the police department. More likely, the responding police <br />officer or fire department duty chief will order the fire be extinguished. <br /> <br />While the Council feels that for the most part the fire regs as approved by the fire chief are <br />adequate regarding recreational fires, some tweaking could be in order. One potential <br />revision discussed included the frequency, hours or duration a fire could be maintained. <br />The difficulty with such provisions would be documentation and enforcement. Who on city <br />staff would be tracking how many fires a resident has per week, and for how long? Such <br />requirements would be impractical. Other potential tweaks would include articulating a <br />specific wind threshold rather than prohibiting fires on windy days (what constitutes <br />windy?), instituting a minimum set back from a property line and limiting the height of a fire. <br />(Fire Chief Zikmund is supportive of including a specific wind threshold and height <br />limitation.) <br /> <br />As to the enforcement aspect, I spoke with prosecuting attorney Tom Hughes, who <br />recommends that the recreation fire regulations be incorporated into City Code so that the <br />police department could issue misdemeanor citations for violations. A municipal <br />administrative offense citation could also be issued, with escalating fines for repeat <br />offenses, similar to repeat nuisance code violations. (First violation, $150 fine; second <br />violation, $300 fine; and a third violation within a 12 month period, $450 fine.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.