My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2008/05/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agenda Packets - 2008/05/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:47 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 4:24:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/5/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/5/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No. 9 <br />Meeting Date: May 5, 2008 <br />Type of Business: WS <br />WS: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; <br />CA: Consent Agenda; EDA: EDA Business <br />Administrator Review: _____ <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Heidi Steinmetz, Economic Development Specialist <br />Item Title/Subject: Review Town Hall Meeting Informal Questions and <br />Responses <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />At the April 19th Town Hall meeting, Planning Associate Heidi Heller facilitated an <br />inter-active display to encourage residents to think and talk about Mounds View’s <br />Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Task Force and Ms. Heller <br />developed six questions that were displayed on the wall at the Town Hall <br />meeting. Residents provided input by anonymously placing stickers under the <br />following five columns for each question: Strongly Agree, Agree, Somewhat <br />Agree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree. Attached are the results of the informal <br />and unscientific questions and responses. <br /> <br />Issue <br /> <br />One of the six questions displayed at the Town Hall meeting specifically relates <br />to the redevelopment roundtable discussion held by the City Council at its April <br />7th Work Session. The question: “Do you support City acquisition of property or <br />public financial assistance to promote redevelopment on the County Highway 10 <br />corridor?” received 53 responses, 46 of which were “Strongly Agree” or “Agree”. <br /> <br />Feedback Request <br /> <br />One of the next steps suggested at the April 7th redevelopment roundtable was to <br />determine the City Council’s future role with redevelopment. The Council may <br />determine this by also answering the question from the April 19th Town Hall <br />meeting regarding City acquisition of property or public financial assistance to <br />promote redevelopment along County Road 10. Staff requests the City Council’s <br />feedback regarding this issue. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.