My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2008/07/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agenda Packets - 2008/07/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:50 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 4:29:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/7/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/7/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Light Spacing – Photometric Analysis <br />For the preparation of the Feasibility Report, an assumed spacing of 75-feet <br />between light fixtures was used to ensure a conservative cost estimate. The <br />lighting layout in the Report included 80 shoebox style lights and 11 decorative <br />lights, for a total of 91 fixtures. As noted previously, it has been determined that <br />one of the decorative lights could be changed to a shoebox light. <br />For this more in-depth review, a photometric analysis was performed using the <br />illumination templates shown above to determine the required numbers of <br />fixtures more precisely. The analysis was based on the standards of the <br />Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) for trail lighting. The IES standards <br />include a minimum recommended average amount of light as measured in foot- <br />candles (fc), as well as a maximum ratio of the average illumination value to the <br />minimum illumination value, to ensure sufficiently even lighting throughout the <br />project. <br />The first analysis was performed using a pole spacing of 80-feet, which was the <br />spacing used in the construction of trail segments 9 & 10. The analysis <br />determined that the lighting still met the IES standards at this pole spacing. <br />Using this spacing, the photometric analysis found that 85 total fixtures would be <br />needed to illuminate the pathway. Ten of these would be decorative fixtures at <br />intersections, with the other 75 being shoebox fixtures. A layout of Analysis 1 is <br />shown in Attachment B to this Staff Report. <br />The results of the first analysis indicated that the poles may be able to be spaced <br />even further apart while still meeting the recommended standard. Therefore a <br />second analysis was performed using 100-foot spacing between poles. This <br />analysis found that the standards would be met, and that the total number of <br />lighting fixtures could be reduced to 72 – the 10 decorative fixtures and 62 <br />shoebox fixtures. A layout of Analysis 2 is shown in Attachment C. <br />A third analysis was performed using 110-foot spacing between poles. This <br />analysis found that the 110-foot spacing would meet the IES recommended value <br />for average light level in foot-candles. However, the maximum ratio of the <br />average illumination value to the minimum illumination value was 15:1, which <br />exceeds the IES recommended 10:1 maximum. Therefore, the 110-foot spacing <br />would not provide uniform lighting along the trail and is not a suitable option for <br />this project. <br />The lighting levels and fixture quantities for the options described above are <br />summarized in the table on the following page.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.