My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1993/09/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Agenda Packets - 1993/09/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:01 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 6:08:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/13/1993
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/13/1993
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Mine <br />Regular Meeting September 13, 1993 <br />Maja Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, stated that in the last two years the City <br />has imposed a utility fee, imposed a franchise tee for gas and electric and <br />now are proposing an additional fee for a surface water management utility. <br />If a Mounds View taxpayer were to sit down and add up these fees on a yearly <br />basis and had that amount placed on property taxes he would scream "bloody <br />murder". The City continues to put more and more fees on the taxpayers. Ms. <br />Werner stated that it was her belief that this was the wrong philosophy. <br />Mayor Linke stated that the taxpayers would be paying more if this amount <br />would be put on their taxes than they are paying on a utility fee. <br />Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that the Council and staff should <br />get into a retreat as soon as possible. Mr. McCarty suggested that the <br />Council pull back on these additional charges and calculate the amount to be <br />placed on the 1994 taxes and then get citizens involved and make the FOCUS <br />2000 :cork. Mr. McCarty stated at this rate the residents are building up <br />resentment for the Council and it will continue until the Bel -Rae will he <br />filled again. The "hidden taxes" will not work. <br />Mayor Like stated that. the tax rate can be adjusted now, however, in the <br />beginning there was io track record to go by as far as rates are concerned. <br />McCarty stated that Councilmember Wuori stated that the City Council has <br />decided to take a more proactive stance on street lights. <br />Mayor Linke stated that the installation of street lights is based on <br />resident requests and petitions just as it was when Mr. McCarty was Mayor. <br />Mayor Linke was not at the Work Session in which the proactive stance was <br />discussed, but stated that it is time to become more proactive with regard <br />to the street lights. The Council has requested that the Police earmark <br />high crime areas and the City can be more proactive and put in street lights <br />•where they are needed. <br />Duane McCarty stated that the Council has to take a proactive stance and use <br />the talents and energies of his staff. McCarty stated that this has not <br />been done in the past. McCarty stated that the Council should back off and <br />come back to the residents with a proactive plan -- a plan to get support of <br />the community. <br />Mayor Linke stated that he is not in favor of putting in a street light <br />where it is not wanted by the residents just because the Police have <br />earmarked that location for a street light. <br />Duane McCarty stated that if the area is a high crime area and the Police <br />have suggested a street light be put in to aid in the reduction of crime, <br />the citizens will more than likely come forth and support the placement. <br />Mr. Werner asked if the street light atility fund is a designated or <br />undesignated fund. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.