My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1993/09/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Agenda Packets - 1993/09/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:01 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 6:08:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/13/1993
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/13/1993
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
mounds View City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />sunset provision was put into the utility so a discussic <br />This utility has worked and has actually worked to well. <br />assess the rates. <br />Page Eleven <br />September 13, 1993 <br />It is now time to <br />Naja Werner stated that there is a $5o.0oo surplus. If the rate isn't <br />changed, the City will continue to build up a surplus in the fund and the <br />Council can take this surplus amount of money in the fund and use it as they <br />choose. Werner stated that projects could be completed such as expanding <br />City Hall more. Werner stated that the taxpayers need to know that the <br />council can do what they want with the surplus money even if the taxpayers <br />would be opposed to what is being done. <br />Mayor 1inke stated that the rate setting of this utility would be part of <br />the public hearing process for the budget. <br />Ruth White, 2917 County Road I, stated that she is opposed to this utility. <br />Ms. White stated that she doesn't share the same user fee philosophy as the <br />Council likes. Ms. White states these user fees are taxes. Ms. White <br />stated that when she thinks of a user fee she thinks of a fee that she pays <br />to use the park or the golf course. The needed amount of money should be <br />put on property taxes. Ms. White stated that she doesn't think that the <br />Council should tell her what is best for her. Ms. White stated that she <br />itemizes and gets money back on her taxes. Ms. White stated that the sunset <br />clause was put on so that the utility would be more acceptable and <br />compatible to the people. Ms. White stated that in the past the general <br />fund was used for City street lights and it should come from that fund <br />again. <br />Mayor Linke then asked Ms. White if the water and sewer should also come <br />from the general fund. <br />Ruth White stated that she gets a bill for the water and sewer because she <br />is using the water and sewer. Ms. White stated that she considers the <br />utility fee a maintenance fee. Ms. White also asked if this street light <br />fee was used for County roads. <br />Mayor Linke responded that the Countv takes care of County roads and this <br />utility is not used on those roads. <br />Duane McCarty stated that the water and sewer charges are the funding <br />mechanism which runs the water and sewer department and are billed <br />separately and that can be monitored by the residents. <br />Mayor Linke stated that the street light utility can also be monitored and <br />it does appear on the same bill as the water and sewer. <br />Duane McCarty stated that it appears on the billing in a three letter code <br />and that, in his opinion, 20 percent of the residents don't know what the <br />code stands for. McCarty stated that he feels the residents think it is a <br />4alid charge for sewer and water operations. McCarty stated that he had to <br />call City hall to have the code deciphered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.