My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1993/09/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Agenda Packets - 1993/09/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:01 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 6:08:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/13/1993
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/13/1993
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Mounds View City Council Page Sixteen <br /> Regular Meeting September 13 , 4103 <br /> Keene stated that the utility is based on volume of runoff and, even <br /> though they may have a pond on site and reduced the rate of runoff, the <br /> same volume of water will runoff the property. <br /> Duane McCarty asked how many projects are non-compliant with the <br /> Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. <br /> A discussion followed between Mayor Linke and Mr. McCarty with regard <br /> to how the projects became listed in the Plan. <br /> Mr.-Keene stated that whentheprocesswasstarted therearethree <br /> approaches to consider when you do a plan -- meet the steps of the law, <br /> and do projects to improve the City or thirdly, do nothing. <br /> McCarty confirmed that none of the projects had to be taken on as a <br /> mandate regarding the Plan. <br /> McCarty stated that the best way to do the Plan is to do it through the <br /> process of the Home Rule Charter that gives the citizens the rights to <br /> petition for or against any project. McCarty stated he is willing to <br /> take the assessments if he wants the project. McCarty stated that if <br /> the public supports the project it will go. <br /> Roger Stigney stated that the City is rushing to hurry up and do <br /> something when there is no need to do something promptly. The Plan is <br /> in place and the City has met the requirements by just having the Plan. <br /> Mr. Keene stated that the City is beyond. the date for implementation of <br /> the Plan. <br /> Roger Stigney spoke about the funding in that it is a City-wide project <br /> and it should be given to the FOCUS 2000 program for review. Mr. <br /> Stigney pointed out that the July-August newsletter only offered a <br /> small notice regarding the Surface Water Management Utility public <br /> hearings. Mr. Stigney- felt-that- more-communication could have-been- -- <br /> added to this newsletter and it would have solicited more public input. <br /> Mr. . Stigney stated that the Council should push off the utility until <br /> one of the Task Forces could look at it with regards to options for <br /> funding. <br /> Mayor Linke stated that special assessments and looking at the <br /> maintaining of the wetlands and sediment ponds is a benefit to the <br /> entire city. Special assessments do not benefit the entire city. <br /> Mr. Stigney stated that he paid for special assessments already and he <br /> wants a credit for paying for the storm sewer down his road for the <br /> last 14 years. <br /> Mayor Linke explained the credit process regarding the surface water• <br /> utility. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.