My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/07/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/07/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:59 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 6:32:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/13/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/13/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Four <br /> Regular Meeting July 13, 1911, <br /> Peter Sabee stated that the key issues had to do with location of wetland <br /> boundary, criteria for setbacks, lot width and lot area. Mr. Sabee <br /> explained the change in wetland boundary and how it was derived. Mr. Sabee <br /> also stated that the lot size and area are in compliance. Lot area came in <br /> to compliance by widening lots and bringing the lot lines further into the <br /> wetland. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby asked what had changed in the wetland boundary. <br /> Mr. Sabee stated that basically the change was the method used to delineate <br /> the wetland boundary. <br /> • <br /> Mr. Sabee explained that another concern was the method used for calculating <br /> water quality enhancement. Many communities use the Walker method. This <br /> method works by providing storm water storage to settle sediment particles <br /> from storm water runoff. The more particles settled greater value of water <br /> quality. Wildlife enhancement initial concerns are the shape and topography <br /> of the ponds. Irregular sides and irregular bottom contours of ponds are <br /> better. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby asked if on this proposal there were fewer lots, but <br /> greater proposed development area. <br /> Mr. Sabee responded that there was probably more square footage in lots. <br /> 410 <br /> Councilmember Rickaby asked about a ditch in the proposal. Mr. Roos <br /> described the location of the ditch, where it ran and the location of the <br /> ponds. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby asked what the effects on the flood plain would be <br /> when one is preventing the lowering of the ground water level. <br /> Mr. Roos stated that there would be no effect on water flow characteristics. <br /> Councilmember Wuori asked if this development was changing the 100' setback <br /> on the south_and_east_sides._ Are the setbacks__the same__as_.before_or_do__they <br /> extend further. <br /> Mr. Roos stated that the south side doesn't change. On the east there will <br /> be a change in the wetland zone at the south one third. There will be less <br /> on the west side. Homes on the east side encroach further on the wetland <br /> zone than before. <br /> Paul Harrington, City Planner stated that houses that are currently in place <br /> will remain as they are. <br /> Councilmember Wuori also stated that it was her understanding that the <br /> persons purchasing this property are purchasing a portion of wetland that <br /> cannot be used and could not be maintained as a garden or part of their <br /> yard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.