Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Page Fifteen <br /> •gular Meeting July 13, 1992 <br /> ▪ it is the practice of the City Council to recommend approval or <br /> denial of a development in total. <br /> • the City Council of the City of Mounds View denies the development <br /> proposal known as Greenfield Estates as the request does not meet <br /> or exceed all requirements for development as defined within the <br /> Mounds View Municipal Code. <br /> Councilmember Wuori afteroin through the entire document retracted <br /> g g <br /> her second to the motion to deny the development proposal. <br /> Motion died for lack of a second. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to Approve the Development Proposal Known <br /> As Greenfield Estates <br /> Council went through each item on the resolution. Amendments to the <br /> resolution were made as follows: <br /> ▪ Request for a Major Subdivision and found that it does conform <br /> with all applicable sections of the Mounds View Municipal Code. <br /> . the Army Corps of Engineers and the City's Engineering Consultant <br /> have reviewed the existing wetland boundary and found that a+ <br /> discrepancy does exist in the boundaries shown on the City's <br /> official Wetland Zoning Map. <br /> • the City Council approves the Wetland Zoning District Amendment <br /> to the existing boundaries of Wetland No. 1-19. <br /> ▪ the Developer must meet the conditions outlined in Chapter 48.06, <br /> Subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 in order to obtain a wetland alteration <br /> permit <br /> • the City's_Engineering Consultant_has reviewed the_development <br /> proposed with regard to Chapter 48. 06, Subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 <br /> and found that the request will meet or exceed the requirements <br /> contingent upon receipt of supporting information and approval of <br /> the same. <br /> the City Council approves the Wetland Alteration Permit based on <br /> the City Consultant Engineer's findings that the request does meet <br /> or exceed the applicable sections of the Municipal Code. <br /> the Developer has requested a variance from the 100 foot wetland <br /> setback requirement. <br /> the City Council has reviewed this request and found that there <br /> . are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances which apply to <br /> this property which do not apply generally to other properties in <br />