My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/09/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/09/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:54 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 7:07:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/8/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/8/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Appendix B <br /> RECYCLING OPTIONS <br /> Recycling Separate From Garbage Recycling Collected by Haulers <br /> (Organized Recycling) with Garbage (Current System) <br /> Standardization of • Everyone in city would have same • Recycling day is dependent upon <br /> Recycling Services pick up day which hauler is used <br /> • Same materials collected at each • Same materials collected at each <br /> household household (per Ordinance, after <br /> • Material separation method same September 1) <br /> for each households • Material separation methods <br /> differ by hauler _ <br /> Improvement of • Contract and billing method • Many multiple family complexes <br /> Recycling Participation could be constructed such that do not have recycling available to <br /> multiple family homes could be tenants;would need to pass <br /> included in the city program ordinance to make this available <br /> • If hauler is paid by weight, there • Haulers do not have an incentive <br /> is an incentive for haulers to work to take recyclables, as they <br /> with city to improve participation represent an added cost to them <br /> (especially plastics) <br /> Reduction of Street This method would result in only Street wear and pollution resulting <br /> Wear, Noise Pollution, one recycling truck going down each from multiple recycling trucks will <br /> and Air Pollution street, resulting in some reduction continue at current levels <br /> of pollution and street wear <br /> Reporting of Accurate There would likely be an increase in Accuracy of recycling tonnage <br /> Recycling Data tonnage accuracy (after the city is reports and time needed to prepare <br /> collected, materials are weighed them will continue at current levels <br /> separately) and reporting would be <br /> simplified since only one company <br /> would need to submit reports to the <br /> city <br /> Costs to City and • Households would be charged a • Recycling costs are hidden in <br /> Residents new fee on their taxes for recycling; garbage fees; residents don't know <br /> garbage fees will-n--otgo—down-by a -that-recycling costs money <br /> like amount • Enforcement of the various <br /> hauler recycling programs is <br /> difficult - city doesn't always know <br /> if haulers are abiding the code <br /> unless they get a complaint <br /> • Types of recycling programs <br /> differ by hauler (co-mingled vs. <br /> source separated programs) More <br /> difficult to do city wide education <br /> • More difficult to do "pilot" <br /> programs - add experimental <br /> materials to collection list <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.