Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix D, cont. <br /> Single Hauler Contract <br /> Standardization of All households would be offered <br /> Garbage Services the same services <br /> Reduction in Street One truck would go down each <br /> Wear, Noise Pollution, street, resulting in a reduction in <br /> and Air Pollution street wear. The number of trucks <br /> needed to service the city would <br /> also decrease, reducing the <br /> pollution problem <br /> Reporting of Timely This system would allow for <br /> and Accurate Data accurate reports on the amount of <br /> garbage generated in the city <br /> Compliance with State If all households were serviced by a <br /> Law which holds cities single hauler, the city would have <br /> responsible for knowing the means to know where all <br /> how waste is being garbage was being taken/disposed <br /> disposed <br /> Costs to Residents and • Residents would have no <br /> the City recourse if they didn't like the city's <br /> hauler <br /> • After bidding process is over, <br /> there is no competition among <br /> hauler to provide quality service <br /> • Loss of license fees <br /> • Potential to drive out small <br /> haulers, leading to potentially <br /> higher bids in future years <br /> • Liability issues for the city? <br /> Benefits to Residents • Reduction in street wear, and <br /> and the City pollution <br /> • Every resident would have a <br /> hauler and a means to dispose of <br /> problem materials <br /> • Data collection would be <br /> simplified <br /> `Standarid ation of-services <br /> offered - residents would be more <br /> aware of volume based rates <br /> Note: It was determined by the EQTF that recycling issues should be considered seperately from <br /> garbage. Therefore, although"improvement in recycling participation"was determined by the City <br /> Council to be a waste management goal, it is not considered here. <br />