My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/09/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/09/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:02 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 7:43:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/14/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/14/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Seven <br /> R lar Meeting September 14, 1992 <br /> Councilmember Quick asked Asleson to define Score grant monies. <br /> Asleson replied that Score grant monies are monies received by <br /> the County through the 6 1/2 cent sales tax and given to the City to <br /> offset recycling costs. The $25, 000 Score grant monies would be <br /> given to the City whether or not the billing was done through <br /> Ramsey County Property Taxation. <br /> Councilmember Quick stated that his preference would be to keep <br /> the collection of the recycling funds in house. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby would accept that amendment to the <br /> motion previously before the Council. <br /> Councilmember Blanchard stated that she is bothered by putting <br /> something on tax roles without more input from the general public. <br /> Mr. Oman stated that with hidden costs there would be resistance. <br /> The recycling amount would show up on either the garbage hauler's <br /> bill, the property tax or City utility funds. <br /> Councilmember Quick added that by paying through the City the <br /> residents could pay this bill in four installments. <br /> Councilmember Wuori asked if the County could increase the <br /> 40 rate of $.12. Wuori felt that figure could be increased <br /> because as the pay scale increases, so do costs of accomplishing these <br /> tasks. <br /> Asleson stated those costs have increased in the past. <br /> Walt Witzke, resident of New Brighton, stated that he helped <br /> to set up New Brighton's hauling system and shared some examples <br /> of New Brighton's recycling fund. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby stated that she is concerned about not having <br /> an informational meeting. There was a presentation by the <br /> Environmental—Quality—Task—Force to the Council at their Work-Session <br /> last week and this would have afforded plenty of time to set an <br /> informational meeting for tonight. <br /> Mayor Linke stated that there would not have been enough time for <br /> posting of a public hearing. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby stated that she had checked with the County and a <br /> public hearing was not required on this issue, an informational meeting <br /> would have sufficed. Last week would have been ample time to notify <br /> residents of an informational meeting. <br /> Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, explained the process of <br /> • notification when setting a formal public hearing. There has to be 10 <br /> days notice. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.