My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/09/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/09/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:02 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 7:43:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/14/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/14/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Four <br /> Regular Meeting September 14, 196 <br /> Oman reported that the County has a Joint Powers Agreement for <br /> funding which would place the recycling charges on the property <br /> tax roles. The City needs to work on a budget for recycling. For <br /> example, a charge could be $1.25 per month or $15 per year. The <br /> average cost is $18 per year. <br /> The Environmental Quality Task Force urged the Council to <br /> take action. The two options for funding would be the Ramsey <br /> County Property Tax Fund or a City Utility. There would be <br /> no added expense to the City if billing were done on the property <br /> tax roles It is important that the City continue to work on <br /> funding for educating the residents on the importance o recyc ing. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby asked if the best way to do recycling is <br /> per ton. <br /> Oman stated that recycling could be done weekly or twice monthly. <br /> It costs approximately $85 per ton for recycling collected based <br /> upon tonnages collected over the past and calculated out. If <br /> recycling were done twice a month it would reduce the cost to <br /> $81 per ton. The system recommended by the EQTF would reduce truck <br /> traffic and street wear. Oman also stated that participation in the <br /> recycling program is higher when picked up twice per month. Collection <br /> of recyclables on a weekly basis is done primarily for convenience too <br /> the residents. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby stated that at one of the meetings the haulers <br /> talked about charges per household rather than per ton. <br /> Oman stated that charges would be based on the number <br /> of estimated stops made. Oman stated that it would be a fixed <br /> amount for all pick ups for the entire year. This does not give <br /> incentive to the haulers to increase materials being picked up. <br /> Increased. recycling would reduce the amount of waste hauled out of <br /> the City and the goal of recycling is to reduce waste hauled to <br /> the lanills. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby asked how the recyclables could be •increased <br /> when the haulers can only pick up what is put out unless there is <br /> an education program conducted. The residents, in her opinion, have <br /> the feeling that the less they put out, the less they pay. <br /> Oman explained that the bulk of waste is in the paper collected <br /> because of its weight. Residents who have concerns about costs <br /> could continue to give the paper waste to the Boy Scouts or their <br /> church or whomever and this would decrease the amount paid to the <br /> recycler. The City must choose what recyclables would be collected. <br /> For example, plastic is very costly to recycle. The more items that <br /> can be recycled, the more that is taken out of the general waste <br /> stream. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.