My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1992 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
10-26-1992 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:43 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 7:47:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/29/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/29/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
k <br /> ounds View City Council Page Seven <br /> 411/gular Meeting October 26, 1992 <br /> Project Specifics: ", Fact No. 5 stated, "Past denials of the <br /> project resulted in a lawsuit against the City which now may be <br /> resolved with the proposed development at no additional cost to <br /> the taxpayer. " Rickaby stated that the lawsuit is not on the <br /> project the City is looking at now. The lawsuit referenced is <br /> the one that began in 1981 when the development started out to <br /> be 24 homes and then the development that proposed 17 homes in 1988 <br /> was added to the first lawsuit. Rickaby stated that, in her opinion, <br /> the City Attorney stated that he had entered into an agreement with <br /> the developer's attorney and that the lawsuit would be dismissed <br /> without prejudice. The developer could bring claim again but <br /> according to his attorney that action would be remote, therefore, <br /> in her opinion this matter has already been resolved. <br /> 4 . Rickaby stated that she had received a call from a resident to get <br /> clarification. What recent court cases does the City have where a <br /> developer has been denied use of his land and do we have any citations <br /> Mayor Linke stated that this resident also called staff and staff is in <br /> the process receiving information. The resident stated <br /> that she would be in attendance at this evening's meeting and, <br /> therefore, the attorney was called to be in attendance to respond <br /> 0 to any questions the resident may have. <br /> 5. Rickaby stated she also noted that the brochure was eight pages, but <br /> that the information that she had asked to be put in was not added. <br /> Rickaby stated that she had wanted information printed regarding the <br /> recycling incentive program. Rickaby wanted the people to know who <br /> the past winners have been. This helps to generate enthusiasm for the <br /> program. Rickaby requested that this item be put in the next <br /> newsletter and pushed out to the media. <br /> Councilmember Quick: No report. <br /> Counci lme ber B±-an-chard: No—report. <br /> REPORT OF MAYOR: <br /> 1. Mayor Linke thanked those that put on the Candidacy Forum. <br /> Linke stated that those persons did an excellent job and that <br /> he had heard many positive comments. <br /> Copies of the tape of the candidacy forum are available to be <br /> checked out for viewing as well as the public library also has <br /> a copy of the tape for viewing. <br /> 2 . Mayor Linke referred to the adoption of a resolution for Paster <br /> 0 Enterprises that was passed two weeks ago. The resolution did not <br /> restrict the lighting to the front of the building. The resolution <br /> should have stated only on the front as the residents in that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.