Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Page Three <br /> •pular Meeting October 26, 1992 <br /> Commission have input into the decision. No decision has been made at this <br /> time, but all members have expressed opinions along the same line. <br /> CONSENT AGENDA: <br /> Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the Consent Agenda. <br /> Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council desired removed. The <br /> Council removed no items. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Rickaby to adopt the Consent Agenda as <br /> presented. <br /> VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> COUNCIL BUSINESS: <br /> A. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-406C <br /> regarding a conditional use permit for 3030 County Road J. Harrington <br /> stated that in response to a request from Councilmember Rickaby, staff <br /> visited the site to determine whether conditions associated with the <br /> aforementioned request were being met. Upon inspection, it was found <br /> • that an automobile was being kept in the area defined in the <br /> Conditional Use Permit as accessory building area. Chapter 40 of the <br /> City's Municipal Code does not allow for the storage of automobiles <br /> within accessory buildings. This is a clear violation of the <br /> Conditional Use Permit approved in Resolution No. 4081 dated May 13, <br /> 1991. <br /> This item had been sent to the Planning Commission for review and <br /> reconsideration. After reviewal, it was the Planning Commission's <br /> decision that the property be subject to conditions adopted as part of <br /> the original request. The Commission suggested a timeframe of 30 days <br /> for Mr. Engberg to bring the property into conformance with the <br /> resolution. <br /> Harrington stated that he had telephoned Mr. Engberg and he would not <br /> be able to attend tonight's meeting. Mr. Engberg had stated that he <br /> did not fully understand what was required to bring the property into <br /> conformance. Harrington explained the requirements to Mr. Engberg. <br /> Councilmember Blanchard stated that the Planning Commission had <br /> been working with Mr. Engberg for the past two months and he has <br /> not cooperated at all. The Planning Commission had made recommenda- <br /> tions to Mr. Engberg and also informed him of what would happen if <br /> he did not bring the property into conformance. Mr. Engberg <br /> chose to ignore the recommendations of the Planning Commission. <br /> • Councilmember Rickaby asked if the resolution for Conditional Use <br /> Permit could be rescinded. <br />