My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1992 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
10-13-1992 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:32 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 7:52:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/13/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/13/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Six <br /> Regular Meeting - - - - - October 13, 190 <br /> Sharon Croon, Eastwood Road, stated that she works at a large corporation <br /> and that job classifications are not worth a hill of beans. The Corporate <br /> managers where she is employed are taking pay cuts. Why can't employees of <br /> the City of Mounds View take pay cuts? <br /> Orduno stated that Sears is not under state law. None of the private sector <br /> business are under the state pay equity law. Orduno explained the pay <br /> equity law. <br /> Orduno stated that with regards to Unions in terms of negotiations an <br /> arbitrator for police or fire would not uphold a 0% increase. There is a <br /> different perspective in the public sector vs. the private sector. <br /> Croon stated that the City should start at the top and work down as far as <br /> pay cuts. Have the cuts be across the board and deal with pay equity law. <br /> It has to be started someplace. Other people in the community are taking <br /> pay cuts and losing jobs. - <br /> Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, wanted to know if a job description is the <br /> same thing as a position classification. <br /> Orduno stated that it is a title for certain duties. <br /> Mayor Linke explained that the work that these people are doing does not f <br /> ilo <br /> the job that they are doing. <br /> Bill Frits asked how many unions the City has. Frits stated that his belief <br /> is the City has one Union and one decertified bargaining unit which has no <br /> force in law. Frits further stated that he doesn't support non-union <br /> workers getting union wages. These people can be cut. Comparable worth is <br /> comparable throughout the City. Frits stated if you cut one cut them all <br /> including yourself. <br /> Rickaby stated that the Planning Technician was reclassified to City <br /> Planner. Rickaby asked the reclassification compares with City Planners in <br /> the-past? <br /> Orduno explained that job duties have changed. The level of accountability <br /> and investigation issues has grown. Paul works with the City Attorney <br /> regarding development agreements. Orduno stated that Paul is far superior <br /> to the other City Planners that the City has employed. Orduno stated that <br /> many things fell through the cracks. Paul's expertise is such that he has <br /> been involved in tax increment and development agreements since he began <br /> employment with the City. Paul is doing duties far beyond those of a <br /> Planning Technician. Paul is also primary liaison to the Planning <br /> Commission. Planning Technicians do not do this job nor do they get <br /> involved with TIF or development agreements. Planning Technicians that have <br /> been with the City in the past have not been involved to the degree that <br /> Paul has. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.