My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1992 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
10-13-1992 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:32 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 7:52:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/13/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/13/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Mounds View City Council Page Twelve <br /> Regular Meeting October 13, 1111 <br /> Charles Miller stated that the franchise fee has been in existence <br /> for 18 years and has never had to be used. The fee has raised its <br /> head in the past. The property tax process is already established <br /> and should be used. The property tax amount has already been <br /> submitted to the State. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby during a meeting Don Brager stated that by <br /> increasing the property tax the City would receive more in fiscal <br /> disparities. The fiscal disparity would not be felt that year but <br /> the next year. Rickaby stated that whatever amount the City Council <br /> decides to set for the franchise fee, that amount will go up with no <br /> action on the part of the residents. Councilmember Rickaby stated that <br /> on the survey when asked about the franchise fee, 63% voted against it. <br /> Charlie Hall, Mermaid, stated again that the residents are concerned <br /> about this franchise fee and it should be deleted from the agreements. <br /> Dave Schwartz of NSP stated that one out of 42 has a franchise fee <br /> in affect. Mr. Schwartz stated that he has negotiated 27 franchise <br /> agreements in the past five years. Five or six out of those have the <br /> franchise fee provision in their agreements but none have evoked it. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby asked how many hours Mr.Schwartz has spent <br /> on dealing with this franchise fee in Mounds View. These hours will 41 <br /> collected somehow, and it is her assumption that it will be on the <br /> NSP bills. <br /> Charles Miller is not in agreement with paying a sales tax on a <br /> utility. Mr. Miller qualified the meaning of the word franchise. <br /> The way it is used in regards to the utility obscures its meaning. <br /> Judy Trude stated that if homeowners could not pay property taxes <br /> it would go on the tax roll. <br /> Dave Schwartz stated there will be accounts uncollectible. The <br /> non—paymentaeeounts—wild—be—deducted—from thefee paid—to—the <br /> City of Mounds View. <br /> Councilmember Rickaby stated then that the franchise fee does not <br /> have such a stable base. <br /> Richard Oman stated that perhaps the implementation of the franchise <br /> fee be tabled until the budget process is complete and then deal with <br /> the franchise agreements and implementation of the fees. Oman <br /> suggested January or February and let the franchise fee survive on its <br /> own merits. The budget will be finished in December. Oman stated - <br /> again that the franchise fee implementation should be tabled as there <br /> is no pressure to pass it for October, November or December of 1992. <br /> 410 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.