My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/10/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/10/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:32 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 7:52:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/13/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/13/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- �lirAgenda Section: 8.F <br /> owns REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 92-4020 <br /> Report Date: 10-8-92 <br /> STAFF REPORT Council Action: <br /> �Un ❑ Special Order of Business <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 13. 1992 0 Public Hearings <br /> El Consent Agenda <br /> ❑ Council Business <br /> Item Description: Approval of Position Classifications <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> -No comments to supplement this report <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> SUMMARY; <br /> The request for consideration of three position reclassifications are <br /> presented for Council approval. <br /> The positions recommended for reclassification are: <br /> Maintenance Receptionist <br /> Planning Technician <br /> Public Works Foreman <br /> The criteria used for reclassifications are: <br /> 1. Have the duties and responsibilities of the position <br /> substantially changed in terms of degree of complexity and <br /> scope of diversity and/or <br /> 2 . Are the duties and responsibilities of the position consistent <br /> with the complexity, diversity and accountability of a higher <br /> ranked position? <br /> Receptionist <br /> Review of the duties an• response•i i - . - • he Ma-in-tennnee <br /> Receptionist clearly indicate a substantial disparity in the duties and <br /> responsibilities of a similar position (City Hall Receptionist) . The <br /> duties performed by the Maintenance Receptionist are more consistent <br /> with the Stanton classification Secretary B or "Division Secretary" . <br /> It is recommended that this position be reclassified from Receptionist <br /> to Division Secretary. The proposed compensation Step 5 plan for the <br /> reclassified position is: <br /> Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5. <br /> 9. 20/hr 9 .77/hr 10. 35/hr 10. 92/hr 11.50/hr <br /> (continued on next page) <br /> . 414‘"?-1 ( <br /> RECOMMENDATION; - Orduno, Cit Administrator <br /> Motion to approve Position Classfications as provided. Effective date <br /> October 14, 1992 . To be charged against 100-4120-975. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.