My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/02/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/02/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:14 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 9:11:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/3/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/3/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
______ <br /> Poll shows support for senior center ' <br /> ., . PP <br /> . , gaining,significant support. Those <br /> • po <br /> 'REGIONAL • Majority willing are the same major amenities being <br /> ..:....::,...,. <br /> 'considered bythe task force. <br /> to raise taxes - <br /> by MacDonald Meade THE 21-MEMBER task force.. ' <br /> A four-city task force is moving to build facility has been meeting since last <br /> forward following a favorable summer considering the idea of the <br /> response to its community poll shared senior center. In November <br /> which surveyed resident attitudes seniors giving it one of those two the group identified five potential <br /> toward development of a shared priority levels. sites for the facility, all of which <br /> senior-citizen center. lie near where the four cities meet. <br /> Last week Decision Resources, ADDITIONALLY, 46 percent Four of the five sites are on non- <br /> , Inc. released the results of the of the senior households said they tax-generating properties currently.. <br /> .' . .. - . J . I. - . . • . - 1" • • 1 - _ . 1' - I. •/ .11' . •111 . I. <br /> Brighton, Mounds View; Spring non-senior households said they point are preliminary, the group <br /> Lake Park and Fridley residents on know of nearby seniors who they has suggested that the center's. <br /> their feelings toward and ideas for felt would be interested in using construction costs would run <br /> a regional senior-citizen center. the facility. roughly $1.7 million, and annual <br /> Decision Resources was operating costs would be about <br /> commissioned by the four cities NOT ONLY did the poll show $360,000. The latter cost is. <br /> and conducted the survey in early a senior center would be used, but presumed to be a cost that is • <br /> December. it showed that there is some already being paid by the four <br /> "There was a strong and willingness to increase taxes to pay cities and their seniors for current • <br /> widespread support •for the for it. senior programs but the <br /> construction of a Regional Senior The general population sample construction cost represents an <br /> Center,"Decision Resources writes showed that 21 percent would be additional cost to the cities. <br /> in its executive summary of the willing to raise their taxes as high According to Dana Rebelein, a <br /> survey. as $20 per year to pay for it while New Brighton City Council <br /> £Kt}mitt; ;Ji ? D#it€f}ii1r il It further concludes in the another 43 percent said they would member who co-chairs the Senior 1l2ii. <br /> summary, "A Regional Senior support various specific tax Center Task Force, to pay the- <br /> Center,then,is an idea whose time increases between $2 and $17 construction costs the cities likely <br /> has come." annually. The senior population will ask the Legislature for <br /> sample showed similar sentiment authority to enter into an joint- <br /> ACCORDING TO the survey, with 22 percent willing to raise powers agreement which will <br /> roughly one in five households in their taxes as high as$20 per year allow the cities to levy for the costs <br /> the four cities includes one or more and another 38 percent who would of constructing the facility outside <br /> senior citizens. The poll included support specific increases between of the existing levy limits on cities.: <br /> two facets including one that $2 and$17 annually. ..; <br /> queried a sample of the general HOWEVER, Rebelein said <br /> population in the four cities and a OFFSETTING those numbers before that occurs the task force <br /> second-that-included only-senior somewhat,-howeveruis-the-fact-that il-l-eontinue-to-eva-l-ua-te-th€- <br /> citizens. 21 percent of the senior-only survey,develop more accurate cost <br /> e execu ve summary no es samp e, an. per - • - es 'ma es an. a m•r- •e .i • 1 • <br /> that an interesting finding of the general-population sample said evaluation of the proposed sites. <br /> poll is the fact that a larger they would be unwilling to She said that process could lead to <br /> percentage of the general increase their taxes to pay for the the four cities continuing with the <br /> population supports the facility. process, or she said it could make <br /> establishment of the senior center Asked to list their three top it clear to one or more of the cities <br /> than does that of just the senior choices out of a list of seven that it isn't feasible for them. <br /> population. amenities for such a senior center, <br /> congregate dining/large gathering She suggested that she would <br /> NONETHELESS,both groups facilities was easily the top choice. hope much of the research work <br /> strongly support the idea with 51 Kitchen and kitchenettes were also will occur in time for the task force <br /> percent of the general population listed as a high priority in the to release its final report and : - I <br /> deeming it a "top" or "major" facility, with an arts and crafts recommendation to the cities <br /> priority, and 52 percent of the room and a game room also sometime in February. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.