Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council December 11, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Thomas. To Approve the Snow Storage Amendments as Read by 1 <br />Director Ericson. 2 <br /> 3 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Flaherty indicated that he feels 10% park dedication fee is fair but he is really 6 <br />concerned that this property will be cleared and the City will be waiting for it to develop. He 7 <br />then said he will not support this. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Director Ericson indicated Staff will work with the Developer to negotiate phased grading of the 10 <br />site to eliminate the clear cutting of the site. 11 <br /> 12 <br />City Administrator Ulrich suggested that a condition could be suggested that a phasing be 13 <br />required for the clearing of the property. 14 <br /> 15 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney. To Add a Requirement for the Developer to Submit a 16 <br />Phasing Plan for Clearing the Vegetation from the Property. 17 <br /> 18 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Mayor Marty indicated that New Brighton is developing hundreds of condos right now so this 21 <br />area of the City is saturated with them. He then said that those condos have a lake view. He 22 <br />further said that he feels that this takes a marketable property and takes out the middle section 23 <br />limiting any redevelopment potential for the area. 24 <br /> 25 <br /> Ayes – 3 Nays – 2(Flaherty/Marty) Motion carried. 26 <br /> 27 <br /> C. Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 6982 Approving the 2007-2008 Street 28 <br />and Utility Improvement Project Feasibility Report 29 <br /> 30 <br />Public Works Director Lee explained that this public hearing would provide residents an 31 <br />opportunity to be heard on this project, which is a requirement because part of this project is 32 <br />funded through the assessment process. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Director Lee explained the 2007 – 2008 Streets and Utility Improvement Project for Council and 35 <br />those in attendance. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Director Lee provided an overview of the costs associated with the project and outlined the 38 <br />funding sources for the project. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Director Lee indicated that the single family homes are proposed to be assessed $3,164.84 and 41 <br />other properties the assessment would be based on front footage costs of $98.33 per front foot. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Director Lee explained that there is a 60-day appeal period required and the next action is to 44 <br />order the project as outlined if Council makes the determination to proceed. 45