My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2007/05/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Agenda Packets - 2007/05/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:59 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 2:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/14/2007
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/14/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 26, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />Finance Director Beer indicated that there were other expenses in that fund outside of forfeitures. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Mayor Marty indicated the report was good and the summary page was very concise. He then 3 <br />commented that investment income is doing well. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Community Development Director Ericson noted that there was an authorization to abate the 6 <br />property at 2263 County Road H2. He then updated Council noting that after the 10 days had 7 <br />expired, the crew went out and the property has been cleaned up and is compliant. Staff made 8 <br />contact with the property owner. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Director Ericson indicated that Dan Hall would like to replace the sign but they cannot replace it 11 <br />with the same components. Therefore, they would like to use new technology and Staff informed 12 <br />them that the City had adopted a moratorium on new signs that would apply to him as it would be 13 <br />an upgrade despite the fact that the sign was damaged by lightening last year. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Director Ericson said that the Code is silent on advertising off site activities and they probably 16 <br />can do it as is being asked. Legal Staff has agreed that they cannot replace their sign using the 17 <br />new technology. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that they should be advertising their own business not some 20 <br />other business. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Mayor Marty indicated that the first time he ran for mayor his name was on the sign but that 23 <br />summer he talked to the Halls and Dan was complaining about costs to maintain the sign and he 24 <br />has asked about franchise fees as it is based on electricity and the sign costs him $1,000 per 25 <br />month. At that time he had mentioned that they were going to go LED. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Marty said that he would be willing to refer this to the work session for discussion and 28 <br />then said that he does feel that they should be advertising for their own business on the sign. He 29 <br />then said that it is unfortunate that a flagship business of the City is being impacted by the 30 <br />moratorium. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that there is a moratorium in place for a reason and it should 33 <br />remain in place to allow time for the research that is necessary. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Staff will work with legal counsel on the offsite advertising for discussion at the work session. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Mueller said that Council was asking for studies on safety and she will be 38 <br />interested in what the business owner has to say but the moratorium was put in place for a reason. 39 <br /> 40 <br />There was consensus to add it to the work session agenda for discussion. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Director Ericson reported that the final draft of the Tree Preservation Ordinance will be on the 43 <br />Agenda for review at the work session. He then said that the building official will give a power 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.