Laserfiche WebLink
April 27, 1992 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The various LMCIT coverages decreased primarily as a consequence of General Liability coverage premiums <br /> being lower due to a reduced level of expenditures for 1992/1993 compared to 1991/1992. An additional coverage <br /> for 1992/1993 is petrofund reimbursement for an annual premium of$500. The City is required by EPA <br /> regulations to show financial responsibility in the event of a leak in underground fuel storage tanks. This <br /> coverage is for such an eventuality and it is excess to any reimbursement the City may receive from the MPCA <br /> Superfund. <br /> Boiler and machinery coverage premiums increased from $4,417 in 1991/1992 to $ 4,859 for 1992/1993. In <br /> addition to an inflationary price increase the premium reflects the addition of the standby generator planned for <br /> the new water tower and the ground reservoir. <br /> The renewal premiums maintain the City's deductible at $5,000 per occurrence with an annual aggregate of <br /> $50,000. An annual savings of$21,000 is realized with that deductible compared to the $1,000 deductible that the <br /> City formerly had approximately five years ago. I requested information on larger deductibles in an effort to save <br /> some money in light of our budget wocs. A$10,000 deductible with an annual aggregate of$50,000 would result <br /> in an additional savings of$5,459 on the 1992/1993 renewal premium. A$25,000 deductible with an annual <br /> aggregate of$50,000 would result in an additional savings of$13,690 on the 1992/1993 renewal premium. My <br /> recollection of the five years that the City has had a $5,000 deductible is that the savings in reduced premiums <br /> more than compensated for the increased deductible. I have requested from the LMCIT a listing of the claims <br /> that the City paid compared to the premium savings for that period. Hopefully that information will be available <br /> for the April 27 Council meeting. My inclination is that the City increase the deductible from $5,000 to $10,000 <br /> and establish a self insurance account to pay claims that are under $10,000. If this account were established I <br /> would recommend that the savings realized from the larger deductible be placed into the account each year. In <br /> that way sufficient monies would be available if there were large claims to be paid and such claims would not be <br /> "budget busters". I would appreciate Council's thoughts on this matter. <br /> Presently the City has $10,000 blanket honesty bonds on all employees and a total of$50,000 for the Clerk- <br /> Administrator and the Finance Director-Treasurer. Our Agent is recommending that the bonds for all employees <br /> be $50,000 for an additional annual premium of$130. The increased bonding would provide better protection for <br /> the City at a nominal cost. I concur with our Agent's recommendation. <br /> Presently the City has a lot of citizen volunteers assisting on boards and commissions and with various projects. <br /> The LMCIT is now offering a $1,000 Accident Plan for City Volunteers. Presently the City has liability coverage <br /> which would pay for an injury to a volunteer if it were proven that the City was at fault. The Accident Plan <br /> would provide up to $1,000 medical coverage on a no fault basis for a premium of$1,818 per year. This coverage <br /> could be a nice way to say that volunteers are appreciated. If they are injured their medical bills would be paid <br /> regardless who is at fault. Actual coverage is small ($1,000) and coverage is somewhat restricted, i.e., if a <br /> volunteer is part of a group working on a project there is no coverage as it is assumed that the group will be <br /> carrying their own coverage for their members. The majority of people carry some type of medical insurance <br /> which would pay their medical expenses should they be injured and the City was not at fault. Thus, it appears to <br /> me that-this-aim ageis-oflimited-benefit-to he€ity-and-thatthe premium—is high in-relation-to-the-benefit. l- <br /> seek the Council's direction on this matter. <br /> The renewal premiums are $27,459 under the amounts budgeted for insurance in the 1992 Budget as an increase <br /> in all premiums was budgeted whereas overall the premiums are approximately the same as last year. A brief <br /> comparison of the premiums to budget is shown below. <br /> Comparison of-1992/1993 Premiums to Budget- <br /> Budget Actual Variance <br /> Workers Comp $ 78,238 $ 58,246 - $ 19,992 <br /> All Other $ 87,500 $ 80,033 - $ 7,467 <br /> Total $165,738 $138,279 - $ 27,459 <br />