My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/04/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/04/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:38 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 3:03:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/27/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/27/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. 4224 <br /> CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> A RESOLUTION URGING THE MINNESOTA CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION TO CO- <br /> SPONSOR AND SUPPORT CABLE LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD PROVIDE <br /> CONSUMER PROTECTION FOR CABLE TELEVISION SUBSCRIBERS, PRESERVE <br /> COMMUNITY TELEVISION CHANNELS AND FUNDING SUPPORT, AND PROTECT <br /> THE CITY'S AUTHORITY TO CONTROL AND MANAGE ITS PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF- <br /> WAY <br /> WHEREAS, THE 1984 Cable Act deregulated cable <br /> subscriber rates in over 90% of the cable systems in the United <br /> States; and <br /> WHEREAS, the economics of cable television, like those <br /> of local telephone and electric service, do not favor head-to- <br /> head competition between cable companies, thereby creating a de <br /> facto monopoly even when franchises are non-exclusive; and <br /> WHEREAS, subscriber rates have increased dramatically, <br /> far higher than the annual rate of inflation, since the enactment <br /> of the 1984 Cable Act; and <br /> WHEREAS, proposed alternatives to the cable company <br /> monopoly, telephone entry into the cable business and direct <br /> broadcast satellites, have no provisions for community television <br /> channels or funding for public, educational or government access; <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, _the_Federahommunications _Commission_has <br /> issued a ruling favoring Video Dialtone Service, which would <br /> allow telephone companies to provide television services without <br /> having to request a franchise to use the public rights-of-way <br /> from the local government's authority to control and manage this <br /> valuable piece of public property; and <br /> WHEREAS, local regulatory cable commissions and local <br /> governments are not protected from legal claims challenging local <br /> regulation contemplated by applicable federal, state or local law <br /> or franchise; and <br /> WHEREAS, H.R. 3560, which was introduced by Congressmen <br /> Eckart and Cooper, contains provisions that clearly represent <br /> consumer interests and better balance the regulation of cable <br /> television services; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.