Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />activities observed by the Police within the structure he occupies and any steps the license holder may <br />have taken to prevent these types of activities from occurring in the future. The City Council may want to <br />question the license holder to clarify the ownership of the building and the business to determine whether <br />the defendant in the relevant criminal action, Edward Waste, has an ownership interest of the building or <br />business. These are relevant considerations for the City Council because, at the June 11, 2007, City <br />Council meeting, Robert Waste indicated the building was owned by "the family.” <br />The Council may: <br />(1) renew the license currently issued to Robert Waste with no conditions, <br />(2) renew the license with added conditions as determined by the City Council as appropriate to the <br />situation (for example, access considerations), or <br />(3) deny the application consistent with the City Code, State Statute, and case law. <br />Based on the ownership of the building and business, along with the outcome of the relevant criminal <br />matter, the City Council may have the requisite grounds to impose civil penalties, revoke, and/or suspend <br />the license in the future. <br />*Vino and Stogies is up to date on their utility bill and have passed their fire inspection. Resolution 7092 <br />has been changed to reflect this update. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />