My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-01-1992 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
06-01-1992 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:14 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 3:15:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/1/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/1/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION <br /> Agenda Section:OM�11. <br /> D� 92-286WS <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: <br /> -1111V <br /> AGENDA SESSION DATE JUNE 1, 1992 Report Date: 5/29/92 <br /> DISPOSITION <br /> Item Description: PRESENTATION BY EVEREST GROUP REGARDING REQUEST FOR TIF FUNDING <br /> OF MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST AND WEST <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> - No comments to supplement this report <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> S B �ili Franke and Tim Nelson of the Everest Group will be present at Monday <br /> night's meeting to address the Council with a request for Tax Increment <br /> financing for the completion of the Mounds View Business Park East and <br /> West. Unlike previous projects, the proposal for the new additions to the <br /> Business Park is one of a "pay as you go" development. The City would not <br /> sell bonds to finance a land write down or public improvements. The <br /> developer would upfront the costs and the funding for the land write-down <br /> and any public improvements would be reimbursed to the developer from the <br /> increment generated by the new tax dollars. <br /> While this appears on the surface to be a "no risk" to the City (and in <br /> comparison to past projects, it is not) , there are some issues the Council <br /> may wish to assess: <br /> 1. In granting TIF for land write-down/public improvements, the <br /> increment used to reimburse the developer would be lost to <br /> the City to use for other TIF projects within the City. <br /> 2 . Because the tax increment generated from the new development <br /> would be used to reimburse the developer, the distribution <br /> of new tax money to the all taxing jurisdictions would be <br /> delayed 10-15 years. <br /> 3 . Unless something is structured to provide for immediate and <br /> on-going "Administrative or Operational" costs, the City <br /> will have increases to its operating expenses as there will <br /> be new development to provide services to without an increase <br /> in tax revenue. <br /> 4 . The Business Park will develop on its own and without TIF <br /> assistance in time. The economy is still sluggish and <br /> it is impossible—to—predict—when it will turn—around—to <br /> provide a marketplace capable of spurring development not <br /> dependent on financing incentives. Tif assistance will <br /> assure that the Business Park will develop far more rapidly <br /> than without such assistance. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> Saman ha Orduno, City Administrator <br /> Everest is looking for the Council's response on their proposal so they can proceed or reassess their direction. <br /> or reassess their direction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.